From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <drobbins@gentoo.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-14) on finch.gentoo.org
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.2 required=5.0 tests=DMARC_NONE,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,
	RDNS_NONE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=4.0.0
Received: from inventor.gentoo.org (unknown [216.223.235.2])
	by chiba.3jane.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3E68200A98A
	for <gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>; Thu, 24 Jan 2002 13:33:53 -0600 (CST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by inventor.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C42814F7B86
	for <gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>; Thu, 24 Jan 2002 12:35:10 -0700 (MST)
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] MOSIX
From: Daniel Robbins <drobbins@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
In-Reply-To: <20020124202059.4e7ced14.styx@SuxOS.org>
References: <20020124202059.4e7ced14.styx@SuxOS.org>
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Evolution/1.0.1 
Date: 24 Jan 2002 12:35:10 -0700
Message-Id: <1011900910.1882.13.camel@inventor.gentoo.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Sender: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org
Errors-To: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev-request@gentoo.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev>,
	<mailto:gentoo-dev-request@gentoo.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux developer list <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev>,
	<mailto:gentoo-dev-request@gentoo.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gentoo.org/pipermail/gentoo-dev/>
X-Archives-Salt: 1638b2d6-da71-40f7-a7dd-e6b38bb6cc59
X-Archives-Hash: 0946920a16aabe52786537689edeb8a4

On Thu, 2002-01-24 at 12:20, Joachim Blaabjerg wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I was just wondering, has anyone "ported" MOSIX to 2.4.17/18? I asked the MOSIX
> maintainer (mr. Barak) if he would do it, but he just refered to the recent "2.4
> - Kernel of Pain" article, and seemed to be unwilling to continue 2.4
> development in the near future... I've tried to "port" the patch myself, but
> there are some rejects in the VM code (IIRC) that I can't seem to fix. Has
> anyone had any luck?

I haven't tried it.  Do you know if Mr. Barak has decided to stop 2.4
development temporarily or permanently?

Best Regards,

-- 
Daniel Robbins                                  <drobbins@gentoo.org>
Chief Architect/President                       http://www.gentoo.org 
Gentoo Technologies, Inc.