public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Richard Reich <rreich@rdrtech.com>
To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] System built with gcc 3.0.3
Date: 20 Jan 2002 23:12:47 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1011586368.456.0.camel@loki> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1011581748.21442.16.camel@loki.rdrtech.net>

I rebooted now, and I cannot log into the system,  It says invalid login
with any userid that I enter.  I've go the latest shadow package.  Is
there anything else that I need?

Rick

P.S.
Remember I'm the guy who rebuilt his system with gcc 3.0.3.

On Sun, 2002-01-20 at 21:55, Richard Reich wrote:
> I'm building my system with gcc 3.0.3.  I've got most packages compiled
> but I've run into a few with problems...
> 
> First BitchX won't compile by default, I had to do a dirty hack to fix
> it.  While it was compiling I had to edit
> /var/tmp/portage/bitchx-1.0.18-r4/work/BitchX/source/modules.c and
> comment out the line extern unsigned <somthing> bitchx_<somthing>ver. 
> The reason is there is a duplicate decleration in irc.h.  Sorry I cannot
> supply the <something> because the file has been deleted after a
> sucessfull merge.
> 
> Next is glibc, aparently there is some check and it won't compile under
> gcc 3.0.3 only 2.95  here is the exact message I get...
> 
> *** This version of GNU libc cannot be compiled by GCC 3.x.
> *** GCC 3.x will generate a library that is binary incompatible to
> *** older and future releases of GNU libc.
> *** You should compile this GNU libc release by an older GCC version
> *** or wait for the next GNU libc release.
> *** If you really mean to use GCC 3.x, run configure again
> *** using the extra parameter `--disable-sanity-checks'.
> 
> !!! ERROR: The ebuild did not complete successfully.
> !!! Function src_compile, Line 15, Exitcode 1
> !!! (no error message)
> 
> !!! emerge aborting on 
> /usr/portage/sys-libs/glibc/glibc-2.2.4-r9.ebuild .
> 
> Now, I've tried the --disable-sanity-checks but emerge gives me an
> error...
> loki portage # emerge sys-libs/glibc/ --disable-sanity-checks
> !!! Error: --disable-sanity-checks is an invalid option.
> 
> 
> Any ideas on how to fix this?
> 
> Now I haven't rebooted my machine yet, for some reason su doesn't work
> either, for normal users that is, root just ignores the errors. Here is
> the specific error...
> sh-2.05a$ su
> su: Module is unknown
> Sorry.
> sh-2.05a$ 
> 
> 
> Here is a list of the other modules that did not compile...
> /usr/portage/app-admin/fam-oss/fam-oss-2.6.4-r1.ebuild
> /usr/portage/kde-base/kdelibs/kdelibs-2.2.2-r2.ebuild
> /usr/portage/sys-libs/glibc/glibc-2.2.4-r9.ebuild
> /usr/portage/sys-libs/ncurses/ncurses-5.2-r3.ebuild
> /usr/portage/dev-libs/pilot-link/pilot-link-0.9.6-r3.ebuild
> /usr/portage/net-misc/netkit-telnetd/netkit-telnetd-0.17-r1.ebuild
> 
> 
> Some of the packages that did build are...
> X, gnome, evolution, xchat, mozilla, galeon...  There are others but I
> won't list them here.  I have logs of all my building if anybody wants
> them.  Also I'm going to keep this setup if I can even limp through it. 
> I use gcc 3.0.3 as my development compiler, and I'd like to use gentoo
> as my primary test platform. So I'd be willing to act as a tester for
> the 3.0.3 compiler.
> 
> DISCLAIMER:  I do know that 3.0.3 is not supported by the gentoo team,
> this is something that I undertook on my own.  There were too reasons,
> 1. I'm sick and twisted when it comes to *NEEDING* the beeding edge
> 2. I use 3.0.3 as my compiler.
> 
> If any of this helps great! If not and I'm being a nusance tell me to go
> away and I'll go sit in the corner with my gcc 3.0.3 ;)
> 
> Rick
> 
> _______________________________________________
> gentoo-dev mailing list
> gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
> http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev
> 




  reply	other threads:[~2002-01-21  4:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-01-21  2:55 [gentoo-dev] System built with gcc 3.0.3 Richard Reich
2002-01-21  4:12 ` Richard Reich [this message]
2002-01-21 11:57   ` Chad M. Huneycutt
2002-01-21 11:51 ` Joachim Blaabjerg

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1011586368.456.0.camel@loki \
    --to=rreich@rdrtech.com \
    --cc=gentoo-dev@gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox