From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-14) on finch.gentoo.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.2 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_ADSP_NXDOMAIN, DMARC_MISSING,MAILING_LIST_MULTI autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=4.0.0 Received: from moutvdom01.kundenserver.de (moutvdom01.kundenserver.de [195.20.224.200]) by chiba.3jane.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05F3825904 for ; Fri, 11 Jan 2002 13:06:16 -0600 (CST) Received: from [172.19.20.61] (helo=mrvdomng0.kundenserver.de) by moutvdom01.kundenserver.de with esmtp (Exim 2.12 #2) id 16P70x-000882-00 for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Fri, 11 Jan 2002 20:06:55 +0100 Received: from [217.225.26.152] (helo=pD9E11A98.dip.t-dialin.net) by mrvdomng0.kundenserver.de with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #2) id 16P70x-0008CH-00 for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Fri, 11 Jan 2002 20:06:55 +0100 Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Secure Gentoo - What do you think? From: Sebastian Werner To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <20020110180945.2f323915.styx@SuxOS.org> References: <20020107171359.45792cdb.styx@SuxOS.org> <20020110145129.4453cc69.styx@SuxOS.org> <1010673640.2290.20.camel@fluffy> <20020110160054.5f8b903b.styx@SuxOS.org> <20020110180945.2f323915.styx@SuxOS.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Evolution/1.0 (Preview Release) Date: 11 Jan 2002 20:07:01 +0100 Message-Id: <1010776021.657.2.camel@wp.smile> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org Errors-To: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Developer discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: X-Archives-Salt: b0439902-638a-4fba-9138-c8f604906284 X-Archives-Hash: 3c1cd1c47786e4c8f39ee39afacb0f2d Hey, really cool this project... mhh it seems that you must patch all the init-scripts, too... or. i look some minutes ago some docs on the lids homepage... really great. But it seems to be much work. So my question. In how many weeks you think you can have the first release of this something like working..? ;-) I must setup a new server in our company and it seems to be nice to do this with Gentoo-Sox ;-) Greetings Sebastian Am Don, 2002-01-10 um 18.09 schrieb Joachim Blaabjerg: > Hi again, >=20 > Another thought; if we use a USE variable, I guess I could just make patc= hes for > the programs (Makefiles etc.), and we could have a=20 >=20 > use secure && patch -p0 < ${FILESDIR}/${P}-secure.diff >=20 > in the .ebuild files of the programs in my system profile. I don't think = I need > to change anything else in the .ebuild, as I can just use the program's > installation routines to install the needed LIDS ACLs, change permissions= , etc. >=20 > What do you think? > =20 > --=20 > Joachim Blaabjerg > styx@SuxOS.org > www.SuxOS.org > _______________________________________________ > gentoo-dev mailing list > gentoo-dev@gentoo.org > http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev --=20 --------------------------------- Sebastian Werner http://www.werner-productions.de sebastian@werner-productions.de Bismarckstra=DFe 51 32427 Minden ---------------------------------