From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-14) on finch.gentoo.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.3 required=5.0 tests=DMARC_NONE,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RDNS_DYNAMIC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=4.0.0 Received: from hagrid.hallendal.net (as1-4-5-1.han.s.bonet.se [194.236.131.211]) by chiba.3jane.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 629C32571A for ; Tue, 8 Jan 2002 17:34:43 -0600 (CST) Received: from fluffy.hallendal.net (fluffy.hallendal.net [192.168.114.5]) by hagrid.hallendal.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD26D85C515 for ; Wed, 9 Jan 2002 00:34:41 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Secure Gentoo - What do you think? From: Mikael Hallendal To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <20020108181120.4A626255BE@chiba.3jane.net> References: <20020107171359.45792cdb.styx@SuxOS.org> <1010487111.773.2.camel@fluffy> <20020108142742.38c480cb.styx@SuxOS.org> <20020108155438.CD6BD255AF@chiba.3jane.net> <1010505612.18126.9.camel@fluffy> <20020108171039.5545B255A8@chiba.3jane.net> <1010510100.18126.11.camel@fluffy> <20020108181120.4A626255BE@chiba.3jane.net> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-dyQJR8d9UaOs1W9Ln1ju" X-Mailer: Evolution/1.0 (Preview Release) Date: 09 Jan 2002 00:35:48 +0100 Message-Id: <1010532948.1019.3.camel@fluffy> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org Errors-To: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Developer discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: X-Archives-Salt: 30259293-36d5-43d0-aef9-7e2b20562323 X-Archives-Hash: e473167d882c8340cd25c85b17e3e113 --=-dyQJR8d9UaOs1W9Ln1ju Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable tis 2002-01-08 klockan 19.11 skrev Damon M. Conway: > Mikael Hallendal wrote: > > > >I agree to that they are powerful but I think they do it in a way that > >makes it harder for new users to catch on to. >=20 > Hm, ok then, but I like the concept. Maybe a method that's more accessib= le > to users. Exactly, I love the concept, but I don't think I like the implementation. I would like something that more or less just overrided variables that can be used in the end-scripts. Instead of overriding functions and such too (which makes the end-script look like anything but how you do it when installing manually). Not as powerful but not as complex. Regards, Mikael Hallendal --=20 Mikael Hallendal Gentoo Linux Developer, Desktop Team Leader CodeFactory AB, Stockholm, Sweden --=-dyQJR8d9UaOs1W9Ln1ju Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQA8O4JUm0/ts8TQAWgRAkWNAJ4g2dN8DOYdEFpu4s515ddXoBrikACeKRY5 neI0yhOA5fKPj1tasJuLqpc= =BCJL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-dyQJR8d9UaOs1W9Ln1ju--