From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-14) on finch.gentoo.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.3 required=5.0 tests=DMARC_NONE,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RDNS_DYNAMIC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=4.0.0 Received: from hagrid.hallendal.net (as1-4-5-1.han.s.bonet.se [194.236.131.211]) by chiba.3jane.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF521255A8 for ; Tue, 8 Jan 2002 11:14:35 -0600 (CST) Received: from fluffy.hallendal.net (fluffy.hallendal.net [192.168.114.5]) by hagrid.hallendal.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E20A985C515 for ; Tue, 8 Jan 2002 18:14:33 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Secure Gentoo - What do you think? From: Mikael Hallendal To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <20020108171039.5545B255A8@chiba.3jane.net> References: <20020107171359.45792cdb.styx@SuxOS.org> <1010487111.773.2.camel@fluffy> <20020108142742.38c480cb.styx@SuxOS.org> <20020108155438.CD6BD255AF@chiba.3jane.net> <1010505612.18126.9.camel@fluffy> <20020108171039.5545B255A8@chiba.3jane.net> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-U9GMsnjU2O3DFuy9XcK8" X-Mailer: Evolution/1.0 (Preview Release) Date: 08 Jan 2002 18:15:00 +0100 Message-Id: <1010510100.18126.11.camel@fluffy> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org Errors-To: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Developer discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: X-Archives-Salt: abf97808-2575-47ef-abfd-8d1bbb716965 X-Archives-Hash: f5315277040011a14b429b41cac5fcf6 --=-U9GMsnjU2O3DFuy9XcK8 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable tis 2002-01-08 klockan 18.10 skrev Damon M. Conway: > Depends on usage. I think eclasses could be quite powerful for > cross-platform capabilities and system types (SuxOS, Web Server, etc), an= d > they, in theory, can pick up the global configuation baton where make.con= f > leaves off. As long as they are well-defined, I don't see how they reall= y > cause any problems, or make ebuilds any harder to write. I agree to that they are powerful but I think they do it in a way that makes it harder for new users to catch on to. Have you looked any at the KDE build? Regards, Mikael Hallendal --=20 Mikael Hallendal Gentoo Linux Developer, Desktop Team Leader CodeFactory AB, Stockholm, Sweden --=-U9GMsnjU2O3DFuy9XcK8 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQA8OykUm0/ts8TQAWgRAstNAKCnvjn9nHZxjg/MypVnOcCVmZXaPgCeM6X0 Ju3Dt1xqR7cccXixhZYbcRM= =42BZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-U9GMsnjU2O3DFuy9XcK8--