From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-14) on finch.gentoo.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.3 required=5.0 tests=DMARC_NONE,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RDNS_DYNAMIC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=4.0.0 Received: from hagrid.hallendal.net (as1-4-5-1.han.s.bonet.se [194.236.131.211]) by chiba.3jane.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74A19255BD for ; Tue, 8 Jan 2002 09:59:47 -0600 (CST) Received: from fluffy.hallendal.net (fluffy.hallendal.net [192.168.114.5]) by hagrid.hallendal.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2E7085C515 for ; Tue, 8 Jan 2002 16:59:45 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Secure Gentoo - What do you think? From: Mikael Hallendal To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <20020108155438.CD6BD255AF@chiba.3jane.net> References: <20020107171359.45792cdb.styx@SuxOS.org> <1010487111.773.2.camel@fluffy> <20020108142742.38c480cb.styx@SuxOS.org> <20020108155438.CD6BD255AF@chiba.3jane.net> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-89UcXux9rISnSll16Q7H" X-Mailer: Evolution/1.0 (Preview Release) Date: 08 Jan 2002 17:00:12 +0100 Message-Id: <1010505612.18126.9.camel@fluffy> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org Errors-To: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Developer discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: X-Archives-Salt: 4517a7fc-bee6-4ad5-ac0b-c286a621da62 X-Archives-Hash: 359e47788a46e8e14c188e84b3828fbb --=-89UcXux9rISnSll16Q7H Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable tis 2002-01-08 klockan 16.54 skrev Damon M. Conway: > I think this is where eclasses could really help. Eclasses should allow > you to create a meta ebuild that looks for certain make.conf vars set and > react accordingly. danarmak and drobbins are the ones to ask for more > details on eclasses. For now eclasses should _only_ be used in KDE. A decission still has to be made about eclasses. And both me and drobbins have some objections to eclasses. For one I think that eclasses break one of ebuilds most important strength. The ease of use, that they are almost identical to installing a package manually. Regards, Mikael Hallendal --=20 Mikael Hallendal Gentoo Linux Developer, Desktop Team Leader CodeFactory AB, Stockholm, Sweden --=-89UcXux9rISnSll16Q7H Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQA8OxeMm0/ts8TQAWgRAjkiAKCmlDsZvaT0HAKlr8bojqYpw/ynKQCdGrT7 D+HlKSONIUoYolcfjduWTWA= =Es1G -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-89UcXux9rISnSll16Q7H--