From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-14) on finch.gentoo.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.3 required=5.0 tests=DMARC_NONE,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RDNS_DYNAMIC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=4.0.0 Received: from hagrid.hallendal.net (as1-4-5-1.han.s.bonet.se [194.236.131.211]) by chiba.3jane.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01C90255A6 for ; Tue, 8 Jan 2002 04:51:29 -0600 (CST) Received: from fluffy.hallendal.net (fluffy.hallendal.net [192.168.114.5]) by hagrid.hallendal.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 902E585C515 for ; Tue, 8 Jan 2002 11:51:26 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Secure Gentoo - What do you think? From: Mikael Hallendal To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <20020107171359.45792cdb.styx@SuxOS.org> References: <20020107171359.45792cdb.styx@SuxOS.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-UGcBwzNj6IQeQ7NWsu+p" X-Mailer: Evolution/1.0 (Preview Release) Date: 08 Jan 2002 11:51:51 +0100 Message-Id: <1010487111.773.2.camel@fluffy> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org Errors-To: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Developer discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: X-Archives-Salt: d271ee98-6336-4064-ae8e-0bc4a2a31d2f X-Archives-Hash: 616c702a1de608ccd5a8aec65f1bf55b --=-UGcBwzNj6IQeQ7NWsu+p Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable m=E5n 2002-01-07 klockan 17.13 skrev Joachim Blaabjerg: > Hi people, Hi! =20 > Recently, I asked mr. Robbins if I could use Portage in SuxOS, and we con= cluded > with that a collaborative effort would be for the best. I've decided that= I > would really like to make a Portage "system profile" for SuxOS, as mr. Ro= bbins > suggested, and work with the Gentoo distribution (mainly Portage) as a ba= se for > SuxOS, effectively creating a security centralized version of Gentoo. >=20 > How does this sound to you people? This sounds very very nice in my ears. I have a few questions though. Will this work be done on Gentoo or are you planning to use portage SuxOS? An interesting thought here would be to have some variable set in make.conf that if set only lets you install packages from a list of trusted apps/version. This would be a very flexible solution. Since it lets you have the exact same operating system on your workstation/server while having a really secure setup on your server. > If any of you have any protests, suggestions, ideas or anything of the li= ke, > please drop me a line (off or on list, your choice). If I get positive re= sponse, > I'll start learning the .ebuild files and install Gentoo on one of my mac= hines > (okay, I'll do that anyway... ;]). Let us know if you have any problems. Otherwise the only thing I have to say, welcome to the Gentoo community! Regards, Mikael Hallendal --=20 Mikael Hallendal Gentoo Linux Developer, Desktop Team Leader CodeFactory AB, Stockholm, Sweden --=-UGcBwzNj6IQeQ7NWsu+p Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQA8Os9Hm0/ts8TQAWgRAr5ZAJ9yd3+JU1xB0mRntyd7PEyRm8mlVgCg7N9D EDLStH+ivIkExPiM0C9loyA= =B5dn -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-UGcBwzNj6IQeQ7NWsu+p--