From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-14) on finch.gentoo.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=DMARC_NONE,MAILING_LIST_MULTI autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=4.0.0 Received: from ecomm2.fidnet.com (ecomm2.fidnet.com [216.229.64.81]) by chiba.3jane.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 663A825534 for ; Mon, 7 Jan 2002 10:42:59 -0600 (CST) Received: (qmail 19175 invoked from network); 7 Jan 2002 16:41:43 -0000 Received: from dialup-mo-116.rolla.fidnet.com (HELO silica.localmosci) (216.229.74.116) by www.fordland.k12.mo.us with SMTP; 7 Jan 2002 16:41:43 -0000 Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Secure Gentoo - What do you think? From: "Tod M. Neidt" To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <20020107171359.45792cdb.styx@SuxOS.org> References: <20020107171359.45792cdb.styx@SuxOS.org> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Evolution/0.99.0 (Preview Release) Date: 07 Jan 2002 10:43:06 -0600 Message-Id: <1010421787.2703.15.camel@silica.localmosci> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org Errors-To: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Developer discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: X-Archives-Salt: 84bd73b7-f932-4995-bf3f-e7f9462ebac4 X-Archives-Hash: 29cf77c3dea9b6cee93974c427d9fbc2 On Mon, 2002-01-07 at 10:13, Joachim Blaabjerg wrote: I think this would be great! Ditto's to the previous replys. "Dittohead" tod