From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-14) on finch.gentoo.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.3 required=5.0 tests=DMARC_NONE,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RDNS_DYNAMIC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=4.0.0 Received: from bender.hallendal.net (as1-4-5-1.han.s.bonet.se [194.236.131.211]) by chiba.3jane.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A05AE24919 for ; Mon, 24 Dec 2001 19:12:49 -0600 (CST) Received: from zoidberg.hallendal.net (unknown [192.168.114.10]) by bender.hallendal.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D62234DF0 for ; Tue, 25 Dec 2001 02:13:31 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] ebuilds for kde3 beta etc. From: Mikael Hallendal To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <3C26E6FB.6010600@theleaf.be> References: <0GOR009629L95F@mxout2.netvision.net.il> <0GOR009FXD2DN7@mxout2.netvision.ne t.il> <1009115080.8779.0.camel@zoidberg> <0GOS00FF0WQ2SE@mxout2.netvision.net.il> <1009148900.708.2.camel@zoidberg> <3C26E6FB.6010600@theleaf.be> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-VfWNnyI2UN3NkEaDlznD" X-Mailer: Evolution/1.0 (Preview Release) Date: 25 Dec 2001 02:12:21 +0100 Message-Id: <1009242742.1501.0.camel@zoidberg> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org Errors-To: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Developer discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: X-Archives-Salt: 3fa49667-1e03-459f-9c6d-cdd9ab42d7e2 X-Archives-Hash: 756a20806c5614543d195b26923a3836 --=-VfWNnyI2UN3NkEaDlznD Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable m=E5n 2001-12-24 klockan 09.27 skrev Geert Bevin: > Mikael Hallendal wrote: > > Personally I'm not so hot either that these ebuilds would propagate to=20 > every regular user. However, using cvs for developers to make it easy to=20 > test the ebuilds is of course the best way to do so. Why not put them in=20 > gentoo-src in a dedicated ebuild-beta directory. That way, the best of=20 > both world are met. Another idea might be for rsync to filter out all=20 > masked ebuilds. However I don't know if this would be possible. Starting=20 > to branch the cvs into stable / development ebuilds seems a bit too much=20 > of a hassle currently. After the release of 1.0 this might however be=20 > the best way to proceed. This can be solved with CVS branches in gentoo-x86, using branches as stable/unstable whatever, and let rsync (and anonymous cvs) only export stable. Regards, Mikael Hallendal --=20 Mikael Hallendal Gentoo Linux Developer, Desktop Team Leader CodeFactory AB, Stockholm, Sweden --=-VfWNnyI2UN3NkEaDlznD Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQA8J9J1m0/ts8TQAWgRAk4wAKC0Ar1wE4SB1T0M2f/d1+lxvoJjKQCg4R7J RcfCpMPnPau6zT4cEUFSy3A= =FCOb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-VfWNnyI2UN3NkEaDlznD--