From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-14) on finch.gentoo.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=DMARC_NONE,MAILING_LIST_MULTI autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=4.0.0 Received: from ubermail.mweb.co.za (ubermail.mweb.co.za [196.2.53.169]) by chiba.3jane.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE6262474E for ; Fri, 21 Dec 2001 13:36:14 -0600 (CST) Received: from [196.30.178.129] (helo=nosferatu.lan) by ubermail.mweb.co.za with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #2) id 16HVNo-0007NC-00 for gentoo-dev@gentoo.org; Fri, 21 Dec 2001 21:31:04 +0200 Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] glibc-2.2.4-r6 should be fixed From: Martin Schlemmer To: Gentoo-Dev In-Reply-To: <20011221131216.G29599@chiba.3jane.net> References: <20011221102255.B29599@chiba.3jane.net> <200112211747.fBLHlZJ07676@mars.prosoft.com.tr> <20011221105146.D29599@chiba.3jane.net> <1008961650.18289.3.camel@silica.localmosci> <20011221131216.G29599@chiba.3jane.net> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-otXDgqgahpCnEvPaocbN" X-Mailer: Evolution/1.0 (Preview Release) Date: 21 Dec 2001 21:34:43 +0200 Message-Id: <1008963291.21451.749.camel@nosferatu.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org Errors-To: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Developer discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: X-Archives-Salt: 112c42ac-6d64-4ee6-a40b-fb1f6855b9f5 X-Archives-Hash: cbf51dcb273be3b89ba3f8f06c6f5b65 --=-otXDgqgahpCnEvPaocbN Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 2001-12-21 at 21:12, Daniel Robbins wrote: > On Fri, Dec 21, 2001 at 01:07:29PM -0600, Tod M. Neidt wrote: >=20 > > Philosophical question, can something similar to glibc-2.2.4-r6 be done > > when merging other libraries, i.e. X, gnome or kde? >=20 > Yes, in fact, it should all work now automagically. The problem with gli= bc > 2.2.4-r5 is that I thought it would work automagically with glibc too, bu= t > it still needed some help. All "normal" libraries can now be upgraded in= - > place, safely. This is with Portage 1.7.8+. >=20 Hi Just a question to satisfy my curiosity. How does this work? Does portage now keep a copy of the old libs? And if so, isnt things going to get cluttered ? Thanks --=20 Martin Schlemmer Gentoo Linux Developer, Desktop Team Developer Cape Town, South Africa --=-otXDgqgahpCnEvPaocbN Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQA8I47SlsNeMtCTD6kRAnq9AJ9ILeGzgD3wTglrtAYozlA6vc81BACggCpM mj80wQKj+e5s9zgpL10ICVY= =tzwY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-otXDgqgahpCnEvPaocbN--