From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-14) on finch.gentoo.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=DMARC_NONE,MAILING_LIST_MULTI autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=4.0.0 Received: from email.fidnet.com (ecomm1.fidnet.com [216.229.64.80]) by chiba.3jane.net (Postfix) with SMTP id C2ECE23B28 for ; Fri, 21 Dec 2001 13:07:05 -0600 (CST) Received: (qmail 8722 invoked from network); 21 Dec 2001 19:04:51 -0000 Received: from dialup-mo-13.rolla.fidnet.com (HELO silica.localmosci) (216.229.74.13) by 64.251.128.96 with SMTP; 21 Dec 2001 19:04:51 -0000 Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] glibc-2.2.4-r6 should be fixed From: "Tod M. Neidt" To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <20011221105146.D29599@chiba.3jane.net> References: <20011221102255.B29599@chiba.3jane.net> <200112211747.fBLHlZJ07676@mars.prosoft.com.tr> <20011221105146.D29599@chiba.3jane.net> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Evolution/0.99.0 (Preview Release) Date: 21 Dec 2001 13:07:29 -0600 Message-Id: <1008961650.18289.3.camel@silica.localmosci> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org Errors-To: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Developer discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: X-Archives-Salt: ed4e1f6f-0e84-4636-a995-d3f4cfd69ae6 X-Archives-Hash: 0684d1fe322a43d450a1db4840c56e41 Hi! Just wanted to give another confirmation that glibc-2.2.4-r6 merges fine. I tested this on my Gentoo system at work and merged it from a gnome-terminal with a bunch of other stuff running. Very nice! Unfortunately, my Gentoo partition on my home box is completely trashed after trying the same with glibc-2.2.4-r5. (sigh) I'll be spending this evening putting the pieces back together. Philosophical question, can something similar to glibc-2.2.4-r6 be done when merging other libraries, i.e. X, gnome or kde? tod On Fri, 2001-12-21 at 10:51, Daniel Robbins wrote: > On Fri, Dec 21, 2001 at 07:47:24PM +0200, Aycan Irican wrote: > > > Sorry but, > > Applying it, I got no change. Same results. > > > > When it makes "make install", I got errors like... > > The ebuild has been confirmed working by me and someone else. You will > not be able to merge the new ebuild until you have a functional system > again, but once you do the new ebuid should work fine. Sorry for the > inconvenience. >