From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <vitaly_kushneriuk@yahoo.com>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-14) on finch.gentoo.org
X-Spam-Level: ***
X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.1 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,
	DMARC_REJECT,FORGED_YAHOO_RCVD,FREEMAIL_FROM,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,
	RDNS_NONE,SPOOFED_FREEMAIL_NO_RDNS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
	version=4.0.0
Received: from uranus.u235.eyep.net (unknown [194.90.113.98])
	by chiba.3jane.net (Postfix) with SMTP id C4AF3245F8
	for <gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>; Wed, 19 Dec 2001 01:25:20 -0600 (CST)
Received: (qmail 11801 invoked by uid 1000); 19 Dec 2001 07:25:47 -0000
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] libgd & freetype
From: Vitaly Kushneriuk <vitaly_kushneriuk@yahoo.com>
To: Gentoo-dev <gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>
In-Reply-To: <1008249658.21606.10.camel@zoidberg>
References: <1008174436.19710.0.camel@uranus.u235.eyep.net> 
	<1008249658.21606.10.camel@zoidberg>
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Evolution/1.0 (Preview Release)
Date: 19 Dec 2001 09:25:47 +0200
Message-Id: <1008746747.11553.0.camel@uranus.u235.eyep.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Sender: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org
Errors-To: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev-request@gentoo.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev>,
	<mailto:gentoo-dev-request@gentoo.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Developer discussion list <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev>,
	<mailto:gentoo-dev-request@gentoo.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gentoo.org/pipermail/gentoo-dev/>
X-Archives-Salt: bc6cc48e-7af6-4eb7-bf27-ea34dd7cc84e
X-Archives-Hash: 53908de4e00d15cf2c490600d191f65a

On Thu, 2001-12-13 at 15:20, Mikael Hallendal wrote:
> It is not a different package, just a newer version of a package which
> happends to be incompatible with the previous version.
> 
> The reason they are installing in /usr/include/freetype and
> /usr/include/freetype2 is because the user should be able to have them
> both installed at the same time.
> 
> This should be fixed by having dependencies like 
> freetype >= 1.3, < 2.0 (or whatever syntax we came up with). I'm not
> sure of the current status of that.
The why do we have libxml AND libxml2?
And this only one of the many examples.
As I said, incompatible version of library usualy made a separate
package.
So I think freetype-2 should be made freetype2-2

TIA