From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-14) on finch.gentoo.org X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.6 required=5.0 tests=DMARC_NONE,FSL_HELO_NON_FQDN_1, HELO_NO_DOMAIN,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RDNS_NONE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=4.0.0 Received: from fry (unknown [213.242.186.232]) by chiba.3jane.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 118261513B for ; Wed, 28 Nov 2001 09:24:00 -0600 (CST) Received: from fry (fry [127.0.0.1]) by fry (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78762F0AA3 for ; Wed, 28 Nov 2001 16:29:14 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Proposed Issuetracker via PEST From: Mikael Hallendal To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <1006961229.935.6.camel@fry> References: <1006817973.23206.0.camel@inspiron.theleaf.office> <0GNG00DA5ULHBX@mxout1.netvision.net.il> <20011127112204.B13783@atelier.offthehill.net> <20011128162158.7cddced8.karltk@prosalg.no> <20011128095600.A16054@atelier.offthehill.net> <1006961229.935.6.camel@fry> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-xRyUNSjaQYBaDhodoU+e" X-Mailer: Evolution/0.99.0 (Preview Release) Date: 28 Nov 2001 16:29:14 +0100 Message-Id: <1006961354.697.8.camel@fry> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org Errors-To: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Developer discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: X-Archives-Salt: fcb378a9-7247-4912-a711-820f0b39368a X-Archives-Hash: 106262b37beafe446a8510874fdc6093 --=-xRyUNSjaQYBaDhodoU+e Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable ons 2001-11-28 klockan 16.27 skrev Mikael Hallendal: Sorry, accidentaly sent the mail. > > I think PEST would be the best system to use, I just came across it > > yesterday when searching for bug tracking software. The reasons I > > think its a good option are: > >=20 > > - Good looking, simple interface, should be easy to use >=20 > In what way is it easier to use than bugzilla? I thought the interface > (at least the one in the demo) to be quite ugly and non-intuitive. >=20 > > So if Thread and chadh would like to contact me about letting me set > > something up, that would be cool. If anyone has any > > suggestions/comments, let me know. I think I will start in the mean tim= e > > by setting up a test installation on my own server to see how hard it i= s > > to install and see what the issues are. Before we start using any that we should setup and test different system (roundup, PEST, Bugzilla and GNAT is some that come to mind directly). Regards, Mikael Hallendal --=20 Mikael Hallendal Gentoo Linux Developer, Desktop Team Leader CodeFactory AB, Stockholm, Sweden --=-xRyUNSjaQYBaDhodoU+e Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQA8BQLKm0/ts8TQAWgRAsWBAJkB780fsZULyQ8WFQdA4qmEqkr14gCffngH K5mTOKxIshx2tGaAXxl89yM= =3+x4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-xRyUNSjaQYBaDhodoU+e--