public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mikael Hallendal <micke@hallendal.net>
To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Proposed Issuetracker via PEST
Date: 28 Nov 2001 16:27:08 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1006961229.935.6.camel@fry> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20011128095600.A16054@atelier.offthehill.net>

ons 2001-11-28 klockan 15.56 skrev Joshua Pollak:
> Ok,
> 
> First off, I agree calling it issuetracker is a better idea than
> bugtracker, because of the desire to handle ebuilds/feature
> requests/etc. Also, I definately agree, an easy to use interface is very
> important. That's mainly why I don't like bugzilla very much.
> 
> I think PEST would be the best system to use, I just came across it
> yesterday when searching for bug tracking software. The reasons I
> think its a good option are:
> 
> - Good looking, simple interface, should be easy to use

In what way is it easier to use than bugzilla? I thought the interface
(at least the one in the demo) to be quite ugly and non-intuitive.

> So if Thread and chadh would like to contact me about letting me set
> something up, that would be cool. If anyone has any
> suggestions/comments, let me know. I think I will start in the mean time
> by setting up a test installation on my own server to see how hard it is
> to install and see what the issues are.

 
 -Josh
> 
> 
> On Wed, Nov 28, 2001 at 04:21:58PM +0100, Karl Trygve Kalleberg wrote:
> > On Tue, 27 Nov 2001 11:22:04 -0500
> > Joshua Pollak <pardsbane@offthehill.org> wrote:
> > 
> > > Something along the lines of Bugzilla/SF's features/phpBugTracker, etc,
> > > should be fine, right? I could set it up on my own server, or I can set
> > > it up somewhere else. If the project is willing to accept the work, once
> > > done, I'll get started right away.
> > 
> > See if you can't get in contact with chadh on how to set it up on
> > cvs.gentoo.org (which perhaps should get a new alias: bugs.gentoo.org ?).
> > 
> > We should have at least two modes for the bugtracker: end-user and
> > developer. The full-blown bugzilla interface is a bit intimidating for
> > first-time end-users, so they should by default get an easy-to-use
> > interface.
> > 
> > The regular developers should get the full-blown interface, I guess.
> > 
> > The main thing about the bugtracker is that we should _USE_ it. So we'll
> > just have to keep tweaking it until everybody uses it for adding ebuilds,
> > bug reports, wishes, etc.
> > 
> > In fact, we should perhaps rename it from "bugtracker" to "issuetracker",
> > since we want to have it handle more than just bugs: we want all new
> > ebuilds to be submitted through it, so that it can help us not forget half
> > of the ebuilds that get submitted.
> > 
> > Karl T
> > _______________________________________________
> > gentoo-dev mailing list
> > gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
> > http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev
> _______________________________________________
> gentoo-dev mailing list
> gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
> http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev
> 
-- 
Mikael Hallendal              http://micke.hallendal.net/
Stockholm, Sweden             Cell: +46 (0)709 718 918






  reply	other threads:[~2001-11-28 15:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <1006817973.23206.0.camel@inspiron.theleaf.office>
     [not found] ` <0GNG00DA5ULHBX@mxout1.netvision.net.il>
     [not found]   ` <20011127112204.B13783@atelier.offthehill.net>
     [not found]     ` <0GNH00F6Q78Z2Z@mxout1.netvision.net.il>
2001-11-27 20:27       ` [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-ebuild] Ebuild integration / ignoring Joshua Pollak
2001-11-27 23:34         ` [gentoo-dev] " Bart Verwilst
2001-11-28 15:50         ` [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-ebuild] " Karl Trygve Kalleberg
2001-11-28 15:21     ` [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-user] " Karl Trygve Kalleberg
2001-11-28 14:37       ` Mikael Hallendal
2001-11-28 14:56       ` [gentoo-dev] Proposed Issuetracker via PEST Joshua Pollak
2001-11-28 15:27         ` Mikael Hallendal [this message]
2001-11-28 15:29           ` Mikael Hallendal
2001-11-28 15:37         ` Jon Nelson
2001-11-28 15:56           ` Mikael Hallendal
2001-11-28 16:28             ` Joshua Pollak
2001-11-28 17:06               ` Jon Nelson
2001-11-28 17:47                 ` Joshua Pollak
2001-11-28 18:34                   ` Mikael Hallendal
2001-11-28 20:38                     ` [gentoo-dev] IssueTracker Requirements Joshua Pollak
2001-11-28 21:21                       ` Jon Nelson
2001-11-28 18:37                 ` [gentoo-dev] Proposed Issuetracker via PEST Bart Verwilst
2001-11-28 17:11             ` [gentoo-dev] " Andreas Voegele
2001-11-28 17:56               ` Joshua Pollak
2001-11-28 18:35                 ` Jon Nelson
2001-11-28 20:08                   ` Joshua Pollak
2001-11-28 18:27               ` Mikael Hallendal
2001-11-28 15:06       ` [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-user] Re: [gentoo-ebuild] Ebuild integration / ignoring Chad Huneycutt
2001-12-04 18:06         ` Karl Trygve Kalleberg

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1006961229.935.6.camel@fry \
    --to=micke@hallendal.net \
    --cc=gentoo-dev@gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox