From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-14) on finch.gentoo.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=DMARC_NONE,MAILING_LIST_MULTI autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=4.0.0 Received: from postoffice.mail.cornell.edu (postoffice.mail.cornell.edu [132.236.56.7]) by chiba.3jane.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BE3CB6B3 for ; Fri, 16 Nov 2001 13:40:21 -0600 (CST) Received: from gemini.nutopia.org (nrb23a.resnet.cornell.edu [128.253.186.99]) by postoffice.mail.cornell.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA03911 for ; Fri, 16 Nov 2001 14:38:23 -0500 (EST) From: Nicholas Burlett To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <1005934556.1345.14.camel@nosferatu.lan> References: <1005911304.6483.2.camel@zoidberg> <3BF50A5B.8865A633@gentoo.org> <1005911911.6483.4.camel@zoidberg> <3BF50DB7.80B500F4@gentoo.org> <1005912898.10193.7.camel@zoidberg> <20011116154533.A29101@ilse.asys-h.de> <1005923519.646.0.camel@zoidberg> <1005934556.1345.14.camel@nosferatu.lan> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Evolution/0.14.99 (Preview Release) Date: 16 Nov 2001 14:42:09 -0500 Message-Id: <1005939730.8251.19.camel@gemini.nutopia.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: [gentoo-dev] How stable is RC-6? Sender: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org Errors-To: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Developer discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: X-Archives-Salt: 3fc7c16b-95ff-4551-aa8b-bb6579df2a74 X-Archives-Hash: ec9e421e34bc76b18351cf22a425cdee I've been using gentoo rc5 since the middle of the summer, and I'm quite happy with it. I'm looking to upgrade to RC6, but I want to make sure that it's safe to do so (ie: the install won't leave my computer in a state of disrepear unless I don't follow the directions...) I don't mind if some things are broken (I hear some of the e-builds don't work yet). Thanks, and continue the great work! Nicholas Burlett nrb23@cornell.edu