From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-14) on finch.gentoo.org X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.1 required=5.0 tests=DATE_IN_PAST_12_24,DMARC_NONE, INVALID_DATE,MAILING_LIST_MULTI autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=4.0.0 Received: from smtp06.iafrica.com ([196.2.51.5]) by cvs.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 3.30 #1) id 162Xzh-0006nG-00 for gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org; Sat, 10 Nov 2001 06:16:22 -0700 Received: from nosferatu.lan ([196.30.179.152]) by smtp06.iafrica.com (Sun Internet Mail Server sims.3.5.2000.03.23.18.03.p10) with ESMTP id <0GML00MHT64ASR@smtp06.iafrica.com> for gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org; Sat, 10 Nov 2001 15:14:35 +0200 (SAT) From: Martin Schlemmer Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: All Developers! In-reply-to: To: gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org Message-id: <1005398351.3250.6.camel@nosferatu.lan> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution/0.99.0 (Preview Release) Content-type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-ePfMlRQtY11hDtDneRfR" References: <1005392055.10442.2.camel@zoidberg> <1005395034.3249.4.camel@nosferatu.lan> Sender: gentoo-dev-admin@cvs.gentoo.org Errors-To: gentoo-dev-admin@cvs.gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Gentoo Linux development list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Sat Nov 10 06:17:01 2001 X-Original-Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2001 15:19:10 +0200 X-Archives-Salt: 8c6b7c15-aec9-46a3-91f1-44c5be8107dc X-Archives-Hash: e2681f52c6c590e79fb23863b41db8d3 --=-ePfMlRQtY11hDtDneRfR Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, 2001-11-10 at 14:58, Andreas Voegele wrote: > Martin Schlemmer writes: >=20 Hi > > On Sat, 2001-11-10 at 13:34, Mikael Hallendal wrote: > >=20 > > > I'm currently fixing lots of ebuilds but it's hard work. > > > > also remember to convert to tabs! >=20 > DEPEND=3D"virtual/glibc > >=3Dsys-libs/db-3.2 > ^^^^^^^^ >=20 > Do you put spaces or a single tab in front of dependencies? >=20 a single tab. > I prefer 8 spaces since I've set the tabwidth to 4. But if everbody > else uses a tab I'll use a tab too. >=20 then i guess you will have to start using a tabwidth of 4, or live with it, as it is the wish of drobbins :) > I don't like the combination of tabs and spaces in RDEPEND very much > though. If the tabwidth is set to 4 the output looks like this: >=20 > DEPEND=3D"virtual/glibc > virtual/x11 > RDEPEND=3D"virtual/glibc > virtual/x11 >=20 > There are 4 "spaces" at the beginning of the second line and 5 > "spaces" in the fourth line. >=20 > IMHO either a single tab should be used in both cases or 8 spaces > should be used in the first case and 9 spaces in the second case. >=20 > On the other hand, there are more important things than the number of > tabs and spaces in front of dependencies :-) >=20 true, but we need consistancy. > --=20 > Andreas --=20 Martin Schlemmer Gentoo Linux Developer, Desktop Team Developer Cape Town, South Africa --=-ePfMlRQtY11hDtDneRfR Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQA77SlOlsNeMtCTD6kRAmk2AJoCl58xC7yUmBlq4lck05kRAW0k4QCfXCpD TnA8xDnGUS8lxnMWRIVy4O0= =QeMk -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-ePfMlRQtY11hDtDneRfR--