From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-14) on finch.gentoo.org X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.8 required=5.0 tests=DATE_IN_PAST_06_12,DMARC_NONE, INVALID_DATE,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RDNS_DYNAMIC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=4.0.0 Received: from as1-4-5-1.han.s.bonet.se ([194.236.131.211] helo=bender.hallendal.net) by cvs.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 3.30 #1) id 15tS1h-0000lM-00 for gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org; Tue, 16 Oct 2001 05:04:49 -0600 Received: from zoidberg.hallendal.net (unknown [192.168.0.10]) by bender.hallendal.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA0064E02 for ; Tue, 16 Oct 2001 13:05:18 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] A wishlist From: Mikael Hallendal To: gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org In-Reply-To: <20011015211741.A27192@swool.com> References: <20011014184111.04df9895.karltk@prosalg.no> <20011015211741.A27192@swool.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-cZ9z0ghTyypEWW7X6Oxi" X-Mailer: Evolution/0.15 (Preview Release) Message-Id: <1003237624.8487.18.camel@zoidberg> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: gentoo-dev-admin@cvs.gentoo.org Errors-To: gentoo-dev-admin@cvs.gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Gentoo Linux development list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Tue Oct 16 05:05:01 2001 X-Original-Date: 16 Oct 2001 15:07:04 +0200 X-Archives-Salt: 654aa652-a2be-4a20-bf54-97d134a73a74 X-Archives-Hash: 9796d5a46067643d14f36a6446301abb --=-cZ9z0ghTyypEWW7X6Oxi Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable m=E5n 2001-10-15 klockan 15.17 skrev Joshua Pierre: > Hey :) Hi! =20 > There is only one thing I can think of at the moment besides the bug/feat= ure > tracking system and that it is an extra mailing list, gentoo-user. Yes! What I'd like to see is: 1) Set up a bug/feature/todo tracking system. This should be used =20 instead of dev-wiki (or these features should be added to dev-wiki). =20 IMHO this should be _ONE_ system, Bugzilla is perfect for this=20 (before you start yelling that bugzilla is hard to learn read below). It is good to have all this in one system, a person adds a bug, I=20 move it to my todo-list (ie. assign it to me) instead of having to=20 manually move the item to my todo-list (if we use dev-wiki together=20 with some other system). I vote for setting up a new system (Bugzilla, GNATS, roundup, =20 whichever we find the best). The reason for this is that Thread=20 (author of dev-wiki), seems to have dropped Gentoo completly. And as=20 I've said since before dev-wiki was developed, there will be much more work to add features than to disable them (we would just end up=20 developing another bugzilla for no gain). 2) Remove gentoo-ebuild list, ebuilds should be commited through our=20 bug/feature/todo-tracking system. The current setup is insane, where=20 Dan has to manually move the ebuilds/patches to portage/incoming and add a todo in dev-wiki. About Bugzilla: Bugzilla is a set of cgi-scripts. Just because the default setup is hard to learn doesn't mean that it can't be made easier. I like the default-interface since I've taken the time to learn it (it's very powerful). But I don't think that we should require our users to learn it. I therefor propuse that we make a couple of simplified interfaces: * Submit a bugreport: An easy interface where you can state which=20 package, version, error. * Submit a featurerequest: These gets tagged with keyword FEATURE. * Submit a todo: Set team, priority, what should be done. tagged with=20 TODO. Ximian has such a interface for simple bugreports: http://bugzilla.ximian.com/simple-bug-guide.html And we can generate nice summarys like: http://bugzilla.ximian.com/evo-report.cgi --=20 Mikael Hallendal Gentoo Linux Developer, Desktop Team Leader CodeFactory AB, Stockholm, Sweden --=-cZ9z0ghTyypEWW7X6Oxi Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQA7zDD3m0/ts8TQAWgRAhp6AJ0VeE5mfBL8J6rCIDhUZ2M16+TwxgCg2e9f yAKIHwPwsBwmdb2ZeG+qE3Q= =wZ5I -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-cZ9z0ghTyypEWW7X6Oxi--