From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-14) on finch.gentoo.org X-Spam-Level: *** X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.2 required=5.0 tests=DATE_IN_PAST_06_12,DMARC_NONE, FSL_HELO_NON_FQDN_1,HELO_NO_DOMAIN,INVALID_DATE,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RDNS_NONE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=4.0.0 Received: from [213.242.186.232] (helo=fry) by cvs.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 3.30 #1) id 15t3os-0008LG-00 for gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org; Mon, 15 Oct 2001 03:13:58 -0600 Received: from fry (fry [127.0.0.1]) by fry (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4388CCE292 for ; Mon, 15 Oct 2001 11:13:17 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] What should be in place before 1.0 release From: Mikael Hallendal To: "Gentoo Dev." In-Reply-To: <20011014233423.6d54a2be.karltk@prosalg.no> References: <20011014163620.626d13c5.karltk@prosalg.no> <3BC9F783.6000300@dofty.zzn.com> <20011014233423.6d54a2be.karltk@prosalg.no> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-je5jM7JgkR0OhTwbCGJ2" X-Mailer: Evolution/0.15 (Preview Release) Message-Id: <1003137197.14313.8.camel@fry> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: gentoo-dev-admin@cvs.gentoo.org Errors-To: gentoo-dev-admin@cvs.gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Gentoo Linux development list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Mon Oct 15 03:14:01 2001 X-Original-Date: 15 Oct 2001 11:13:16 +0200 X-Archives-Salt: 5b09af72-e3a4-400f-9e35-9b64818aadbb X-Archives-Hash: 9bbe34c6f01fc1384389a65b8dacefed --=-je5jM7JgkR0OhTwbCGJ2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable s=F6n 2001-10-14 klockan 23.34 skrev Karl Trygve Kalleberg: > On Sun, 14 Oct 2001 16:37:23 -0400 > Blue Lizard wrote: >=20 > > bugzilla _could_ handle this, but while it is technically ready enough=20 > > our development team is in no way prepared to handle the influx of new=20 > > users that would find it a pain in the neck to use. >=20 > Then we find something that's easier to use. We really want this to > further Gentoo development, not hamper it. I do not think our current > system with sporadic mails to the gentoo-dev (and sometimes > gentoo-ebuild!) list is good enough.=20 I don't think that anyone thinks that gnome-dev a good solution for bugreporting. (After all it should be a developer-list for devel-discussions). I think that we should start using a bug-tracking system and that we should start doing so soon. As I've said before, Bugzilla is really powerful but can also be a large step for new users. However, this is with the default-interface, we could do our own interface that's easier to use. Someone also mentioned roundup (http://roundup.sourceforge.net/). I tried to get it running on my Gentoo-machine but it didn't want to play. Someone (and me) should give it another try. IMHO, we can choose either as long as it works. I also think that we should use this system for our "todo"'s, in other words, start using the bug-tracking system for what we currently uses Dev-wiki. I'm not sure about Roundup but bugzilla can also be used for handling ebuilds (instead of gentoo-ebuild-list). Regards, Mikael Hallendal --=20 Mikael Hallendal Gentoo Linux Developer, Desktop Team Leader CodeFactory AB, Stockholm, Sweden --=-je5jM7JgkR0OhTwbCGJ2 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQA7yqism0/ts8TQAWgRAlg7AJ0Vtt82zQH72DYFSBcRf+3mOucDmQCguSxV oTf7vxFSUc5PSopT6UrkQP8= =XRlW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-je5jM7JgkR0OhTwbCGJ2--