From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-14) on finch.gentoo.org X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.0 required=5.0 tests=DATE_IN_PAST_12_24,DMARC_NONE, FSL_HELO_NON_FQDN_1,HELO_NO_DOMAIN,INVALID_DATE,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RDNS_DYNAMIC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=4.0.0 Received: from as1-4-5-1.han.s.bonet.se ([194.236.131.211] helo=fry) by cvs.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 3.30 #1) id 15r4VX-0004yQ-00 for gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org; Tue, 09 Oct 2001 15:33:48 -0600 Received: from fry (fry [127.0.0.1]) by fry (Postfix) with ESMTP id 166ECE6D8E for ; Tue, 9 Oct 2001 23:33:16 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Final qt/QTDIR scheme - even more questions From: Mikael Hallendal To: "Gentoo Dev." In-Reply-To: <200110091515.RAA29656@mailgw1.netvision.net.il> References: <200110090034.CAA09513@mailgw2.netvision.net.il> <200110091418.QAA10001@mailgw1.netvision.net.il> <200110091515.RAA29656@mailgw1.netvision.net.il> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-9C9sxtMrW8KAKDQimf3n" X-Mailer: Evolution/0.15 (Preview Release) Message-Id: <1002663196.15922.6.camel@fry> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: gentoo-dev-admin@cvs.gentoo.org Errors-To: gentoo-dev-admin@cvs.gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Gentoo Linux development list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Tue Oct 9 15:34:01 2001 X-Original-Date: 09 Oct 2001 23:33:15 +0200 X-Archives-Salt: 0119a5f8-6d44-43c8-aa81-af2c71e10b6d X-Archives-Hash: 424ae505a309fa826525316c35605624 --=-9C9sxtMrW8KAKDQimf3n Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable tis 2001-10-09 klockan 17.15 skrev Dan Armak: > Followup: Just one thought, imho a solution to this would be to put qt2 in x11-libs/qt-x11 and qt3 in x11-libs/qt3-x11. This would make sense and is already used in portage for packages which aren't the same over major releases (like imlib, glide). I think this scheme would be good in the way that it won't make users think that qt3 and qt2 can be swapped for each other. This would solve the troubles you have here (even if we would like to have this feature eventually anyway) but in this case I would think that using different names for the packages would be good (aswell as using gtk2 or something for Gtk+ 2.0) Regards, Mikael Hallendal --=20 Mikael Hallendal Gentoo Linux Developer, Desktop Team Leader CodeFactory AB, Stockholm, Sweden --=-9C9sxtMrW8KAKDQimf3n Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQA7w20bm0/ts8TQAWgRAgwCAKClCBNuUp6iSGzOR5jWyZG24K7INQCePYpA xCcSuhxvQMDRlbY1a+hWynM= =pZvI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-9C9sxtMrW8KAKDQimf3n--