From: Mikael Hallendal <hallski@gentoo.org>
To: "Gentoo Dev." <gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Final qt/QTDIR scheme - even more questions
Date: Tue Oct 9 15:34:01 2001 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1002663196.15922.6.camel@fry> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200110091515.RAA29656@mailgw1.netvision.net.il>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 823 bytes --]
tis 2001-10-09 klockan 17.15 skrev Dan Armak:
> Followup:
Just one thought, imho a solution to this would be to put qt2 in
x11-libs/qt-x11 and qt3 in x11-libs/qt3-x11. This would make sense and
is already used in portage for packages which aren't the same over major
releases (like imlib, glide). I think this scheme would be good in the
way that it won't make users think that qt3 and qt2 can be swapped for
each other.
This would solve the troubles you have here (even if we would like to
have this feature eventually anyway) but in this case I would think that
using different names for the packages would be good (aswell as using
gtk2 or something for Gtk+ 2.0)
Regards,
Mikael Hallendal
--
Mikael Hallendal
Gentoo Linux Developer, Desktop Team Leader
CodeFactory AB, Stockholm, Sweden
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 232 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-10-09 21:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-10-08 18:35 [gentoo-dev] Final qt/QTDIR scheme Dan Armak
2001-10-08 21:22 ` Mikael Hallendal
2001-10-09 2:14 ` Dan Armak
2001-10-09 3:44 ` Mikael Hallendal
2001-10-09 4:08 ` Dan Armak
2001-10-09 5:43 ` Mikael Hallendal
2001-10-09 8:19 ` [gentoo-dev] Final qt/QTDIR scheme - Dan Armak
2001-10-09 8:28 ` Mikael Hallendal
2001-10-09 9:15 ` [gentoo-dev] Final qt/QTDIR scheme - even more questions Dan Armak
2001-10-09 15:34 ` Mikael Hallendal [this message]
2001-10-09 16:16 ` [gentoo-dev] Final qt/QTDIR scheme - solution Dan Armak
2001-10-09 17:58 ` Daniel Robbins
2001-10-09 18:37 ` Mikael Hallendal
2001-10-10 11:38 ` Dan Armak
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1002663196.15922.6.camel@fry \
--to=hallski@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox