From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-14) on finch.gentoo.org X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.3 required=5.0 tests=DATE_IN_PAST_06_12, DMARC_MISSING,FSL_HELO_NON_FQDN_1,HELO_NO_DOMAIN,INVALID_DATE, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RDNS_NONE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=4.0.0 Received: from [213.242.186.232] (helo=fry) by cvs.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 3.30 #1) id 15qvHb-0001pb-00 for gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org; Tue, 09 Oct 2001 05:42:47 -0600 Received: from fry (fry [127.0.0.1]) by fry (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D2C3E690E for ; Tue, 9 Oct 2001 13:42:16 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Final qt/QTDIR scheme From: Mikael Hallendal To: "Gentoo Dev." In-Reply-To: <200110091008.MAA29130@mailgw3.netvision.net.il> References: <200110090034.CAA09513@mailgw2.netvision.net.il> <200110090814.KAA12276@mailgw1.netvision.net.il> <1002620603.8699.5.camel@fry> <200110091008.MAA29130@mailgw3.netvision.net.il> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Evolution/0.15 (Preview Release) Message-Id: <1002627736.8699.22.camel@fry> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: gentoo-dev-admin@cvs.gentoo.org Errors-To: gentoo-dev-admin@cvs.gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Gentoo Linux development list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Tue Oct 9 05:43:01 2001 X-Original-Date: 09 Oct 2001 13:42:15 +0200 X-Archives-Salt: 382ca6fe-39fe-4e74-8927-23384c680b36 X-Archives-Hash: dc8642da8e69299f2fa09e3a409af3a4 tis 2001-10-09 klockan 12.08 skrev Dan Armak: > On Tuesday 09 October 2001 11:43, you wrote: > > Sorry I was unclear, I was wondering what "feature"-changes there were > > between the two. Or are they the exact same just distributed with > > different licenses? > > That's right. Up to qt-2.x (not sure which) there were separate packages, > qt-x11-free, -proffesional and -enterprise. They were unified into qt-x11 > which allows you to install a license file. Ok, thanks for enlightening me. > > Ok, didn't know the full name was qt-x11 (thought that someone named it > > so in portage to make it more clear that it was the x11-build). What > > this had to do with GNOME I dunno and why it would ever be called GDE. > > GDE=Gnome Desktop Environment. I just gave an example of unnecessary > shortening of names, a bad one :-). I understand you meant that but the name is GNOME (which is a shortening). I thought that the distributed package was named 'qt' and not qt-. Just as Gtk+ isn't distributed gtk+-x11, in Gtk+ 2.0 all backends are going into the same tarball and you choose (with configure-flag) which backend to build. Regards, Mikael Hallendal -- Mikael Hallendal micke@codefactory.se CodeFactory AB http://www.codefactory.se/ Office: +46 (0)8 587 583 05 Cell: +46 (0)709 718 918