From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-14) on finch.gentoo.org X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.1 required=5.0 tests=DATE_IN_PAST_12_24, DMARC_MISSING,FSL_HELO_NON_FQDN_1,HELO_NO_DOMAIN,INVALID_DATE, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RDNS_DYNAMIC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=4.0.0 Received: from as1-4-5-1.han.s.bonet.se ([194.236.131.211] helo=fry) by cvs.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 3.30 #1) id 15oC2m-0004vM-00 for gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org; Mon, 01 Oct 2001 17:00:12 -0600 Received: from fry (fry [127.0.0.1]) by fry (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65B174DB8B for ; Tue, 2 Oct 2001 00:59:52 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] eclasses v3 released From: Mikael Hallendal To: "Gentoo Dev." In-Reply-To: <200110011712.TAA09983@mailgw1.netvision.net.il> References: <200110011059.MAA24984@mailgw1.netvision.net.il> <20011001154207.7D2C9217DAB@tartarus.telenet-ops.be> <20011001095629.E30964@cvs.gentoo.org> <200110011712.TAA09983@mailgw1.netvision.net.il> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Evolution/0.14 (Preview Release) Message-Id: <1001977192.26460.5.camel@fry> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: gentoo-dev-admin@cvs.gentoo.org Errors-To: gentoo-dev-admin@cvs.gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Gentoo Linux development list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Mon Oct 1 17:01:02 2001 X-Original-Date: 02 Oct 2001 00:59:52 +0200 X-Archives-Salt: a6600970-a353-45b8-b303-728751e0f1c7 X-Archives-Hash: 123d667d3a8a5a5215775ba44117003d m=E5n 2001-10-01 klockan 10.54 skrev Dan Armak: > On Monday 01 October 2001 17:56, you wrote: > > Yes, and what I meant is that Dan Armak should the only one using them, > > period. That means you can't use them. > I understand and agree that verwilst (or anyone else) shouldn't be using=20 > eclasses or his day-today work and all his ebuilds. I do think he should = help=20 > me test them, because two testers are always much better than one. I=20 > introduced Verwilst to eclasses wih this purpose, perhaps I was wrong to = do=20 > so on his first day as a Gentoo developer. Since you hink I should do thi= s=20 > strictly alone, I will. Hi! First of all (and this is nothing against Verwilst) I would appriciate if I was informed before a new developer joins the Desktop Team.=20 About the ebuilds, I think that it would be a good idea if _only_ Dan checked them in. It would be ok to ask help from others to send you ebuild and test the ones that you check in. By this procedure you can control the ebuild/eclasses before commiting them.=20 Also if only you commit them people reading commit-logs will only see you commit to this "project". If lots of people commits eclasses/ebuilds that uses eclasses some people might be confused that it's ok. Regards,=20 Mikael Hallendal --=20 Mikael Hallendal micke@codefactory.se CodeFactory AB http://www.codefactory.se/ Office: +46 (0)8 587 583 05 Cell: +46 (0)709 718 918