From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-14) on finch.gentoo.org X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.1 required=5.0 tests=DATE_IN_PAST_12_24,DMARC_NONE, INVALID_DATE,MAILING_LIST_MULTI autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=4.0.0 Received: from smtp08.iafrica.com ([196.2.51.8]) by cvs.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 3.30 #1) id 15o8hS-0003Mz-00 for gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org; Mon, 01 Oct 2001 13:25:59 -0600 Received: from nosferatu.lan ([196.30.179.247]) by smtp08.iafrica.com (Sun Internet Mail Server sims.3.5.2000.03.23.18.03.p10) with ESMTP id <0GKJ0099EKO4SO@smtp08.iafrica.com> for gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org; Mon, 1 Oct 2001 21:26:34 +0200 (SAT) From: Martin Schlemmer Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] eclasses v3 released In-reply-to: <001701c14aa4$a94ca8f0$6407e0d5@scorpion> To: gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org Message-id: <1001964462.906.28.camel@nosferatu.lan> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution/0.14 (Preview Release) Content-type: text/plain Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit References: <200110011059.MAA24984@mailgw1.netvision.net.il> <20011001154207.7D2C9217DAB@tartarus.telenet-ops.be> <20011001095629.E30964@cvs.gentoo.org> <200110011712.TAA09983@mailgw1.netvision.net.il> <20011001191701.6bd293ae.karltk@prosalg.no> <000d01c14aa4$36f1e900$6407e0d5@scorpion> <001701c14aa4$a94ca8f0$6407e0d5@scorpion> Sender: gentoo-dev-admin@cvs.gentoo.org Errors-To: gentoo-dev-admin@cvs.gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Gentoo Linux development list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Mon Oct 1 13:26:01 2001 X-Original-Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2001 21:27:36 +0200 X-Archives-Salt: a7cfa443-2291-4c4f-84ff-db133d40c549 X-Archives-Hash: 3185d0f1e75ec5288850db74e9f61d1f On Mon, 2001-10-01 at 20:12, Bart Verwilst wrote: > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Bart Verwilst" > To: > Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 8:09 PM > Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] eclasses v3 released > > > > > If on the other hand, drobbins' argument is against Dan seemingly > > > recruiting any and all, or newcomers to Gentoo, then I understand it a > bit > > > more. While I still think Dan should be entitled to recruit the help of > > > any of the other Gentoo developers, Dan should perhaps have handled > things > > > a bit differently and required that Verwilst sent the eclass-based > ebuilds > > > directly to himself instead checking it into CVS. > > > > First of all, Dan didn't 'recruite' me, drobbins did, and i'm trying to do > > the > > best i can for Gentoo, i really love the distro, otherwise i wouldn't want > > to become > > a developer on it. > > Secondly, i sent all the eclass-based ebuild to Dan for his approval, I > > never submitted > > them myself using cvs. I have (or at least i had, hope i still have it) a > > non-eclass kdevelop > > ebuild... I can replace that with the eclass-based one if you want... > > > > Bye > > > > Bart > > And there goes my page-layout again... > pfff... suckie Outlook Express.. > > "I agree, and I think it needs to be repeated that only Dan Armak should be writing these kinds of ebuilds. They are only for prototyping purposes and should *not* be emulated by others. Dan Armak, please remember this or we will kill the project. -- Daniel Robbins Chief Architect/President http://www.gentoo.org Gentoo Technologies, Inc." Meaning, he dont talk about accepting Bart as developer, but Bart fiddeling with the eclasses. Since Dan asked Bart to help, I think it is for Dan and D. Robbins to sort out. Bart: you stress too much dude :) Greetings, MS -- Martin Schlemmer Gentoo Linux Developer, Desktop Team Developer Cape Town, South Africa Town, South Africa