public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [gentoo-dev] 2.4.10 LVM problems
@ 2001-09-30  5:49 Martin Schlemmer
  2001-09-30  6:41 ` Martin Schlemmer
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Martin Schlemmer @ 2001-09-30  5:49 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: Gentoo-Dev

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 332 bytes --]

Hi

Dont use LVM, but from reports it seems that the LVM patch fails due to
min()/max() being changed .. again.

Included is a patch that should be applied to
lvm-1.0.1-rc2-2.4.10.patch.bz2, and 'should' fix this problem.


Greetings,
  MS
--

Martin Schlemmer
Gentoo Linux Developer, Desktop Team Developer
Cape Town, South Africa

[-- Attachment #2: lvm-1.0.1-rc2-2.4.10.patch.diff --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 1977 bytes --]

--- lvm-1.0.1-rc2-2.4.10.patch.orig	Sun Sep 30 13:04:27 2001
+++ lvm-1.0.1-rc2-2.4.10.patch	Sun Sep 30 13:06:59 2001
@@ -3043,7 +3043,7 @@
 -			lv_ptr->lv_current_pe[le].reads  += pep1[le].reads;
 -			lv_ptr->lv_current_pe[le].writes += pep1[le].writes;
 +	if (old_lv->lv_stripes < 2) {	/* linear logical volume */
-+		end = min(uint, old_lv->lv_current_le, new_lv->lv_current_le);
++		end = min(old_lv->lv_current_le, new_lv->lv_current_le);
 +		for (l = 0; l < end; l++) {
 +			new_lv->lv_current_pe[l].reads +=
 +				old_lv->lv_current_pe[l].reads;
@@ -3065,7 +3065,7 @@
 -		     i < lv_ptr->lv_stripes; i++) {
 +		old_stripe_size = old_lv->lv_allocated_le / old_lv->lv_stripes;
 +		new_stripe_size = new_lv->lv_allocated_le / new_lv->lv_stripes;
-+		end = min(uint, old_stripe_size, new_stripe_size);
++		end = min(old_stripe_size, new_stripe_size);
 +
 +		for (i = source = dest = 0; i < new_lv->lv_stripes; i++) {
  			for (j = 0; j < end; j++) {
@@ -4146,8 +4146,8 @@
  	blksize_snap = lvm_get_blksize(snap_phys_dev);
 -	max_blksize = max(blksize_org, blksize_snap);
 -	min_blksize = min(blksize_org, blksize_snap);
-+	max_blksize = max(int, blksize_org, blksize_snap);
-+	min_blksize = min(int, blksize_org, blksize_snap);
++	max_blksize = max(blksize_org, blksize_snap);
++	min_blksize = min(blksize_org, blksize_snap);
  	max_sectors = KIO_MAX_SECTORS * (min_blksize>>9);
  
  	if (chunk_size % (max_blksize>>9))
@@ -4156,7 +4156,7 @@
  	while (chunk_size)
  	{
 -		nr_sectors = min(chunk_size, max_sectors);
-+		nr_sectors = min(int, chunk_size, max_sectors);
++		nr_sectors = min(chunk_size, max_sectors);
  		chunk_size -= nr_sectors;
  
  		iobuf->length = nr_sectors << 9;
@@ -4262,7 +4262,7 @@
  	buckets = lv->lv_remap_end;
  	max_buckets = calc_max_buckets();
 -	buckets = min(buckets, max_buckets);
-+	buckets = min(unsigned long, buckets, max_buckets);
++	buckets = min(buckets, max_buckets);
  	while (buckets & (buckets-1))
  		buckets &= (buckets-1);
  

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: [gentoo-dev] 2.4.10 LVM problems
  2001-09-30  5:49 [gentoo-dev] 2.4.10 LVM problems Martin Schlemmer
@ 2001-09-30  6:41 ` Martin Schlemmer
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Martin Schlemmer @ 2001-09-30  6:41 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-dev

On Sun, 2001-09-30 at 13:49, Martin Schlemmer wrote:
Hi

> 
> Dont use LVM, but from reports it seems that the LVM patch fails due to
> min()/max() being changed .. again.
> 

I am doing it again :-)  Sorry, bad habbit.  What i meant was: I do not
use LVM, but from reports .....

> Included is a patch that should be applied to
> lvm-1.0.1-rc2-2.4.10.patch.bz2, and 'should' fix this problem.

   
Greetings,
  MS
--

Martin Schlemmer
Gentoo Linux Developer, Desktop Team Developer
Cape Town, South Africa




^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2001-09-30 12:40 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2001-09-30  5:49 [gentoo-dev] 2.4.10 LVM problems Martin Schlemmer
2001-09-30  6:41 ` Martin Schlemmer

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox