From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-14) on finch.gentoo.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=DATE_IN_PAST_12_24, DMARC_MISSING,INVALID_DATE,MAILING_LIST_MULTI autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=4.0.0 Received: from smtp07.iafrica.com ([196.2.51.6]) by cvs.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 3.30 #1) id 15lC9R-0008KA-00 for gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org; Sun, 23 Sep 2001 10:30:44 -0600 Received: from nosferatu.lan ([196.30.179.76]) by smtp07.iafrica.com (Sun Internet Mail Server sims.3.5.2000.03.23.18.03.p10) with ESMTP id <0GK400GDVJ4ILY@smtp07.iafrica.com> for gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org; Sun, 23 Sep 2001 18:30:24 +0200 (SAT) From: Martin Schlemmer Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] BitchX and esound In-reply-to: <1001258058.28662.339.camel@zoidberg> To: gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org Message-id: <1001262589.18410.2.camel@nosferatu.lan> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution/0.13 (Preview Release) Content-type: text/plain Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit References: <20010922232229.382ed84d.blocke@shivan.org> <1001258058.28662.339.camel@zoidberg> Sender: gentoo-dev-admin@cvs.gentoo.org Errors-To: gentoo-dev-admin@cvs.gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Gentoo Linux development list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Sun Sep 23 10:31:02 2001 X-Original-Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2001 18:28:30 +0200 X-Archives-Salt: 8a2012eb-9b60-40e4-a87d-892837624650 X-Archives-Hash: fe846da1285d65d3de439fad5c4b2a06 On Sun, 2001-09-23 at 17:14, Mikael Hallendal wrote: > Hmm .. I built it with esound-support yesterday (esound 0.2.22-r2). > > No problems at all. > > Btw, what idiot would name the package so that 0.2.22 is not newer than > 0.2.5? dont i just feel stupid now ? thought the porblem was that 0.2.8 was newer than 0.2.22 and spend too much time to try and fix. just show you that it cant hurt to verify stuff ;p MS