From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 951EB15815E for ; Wed, 7 Feb 2024 11:04:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CAD81E29E1; Wed, 7 Feb 2024 11:03:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [IPv6:2001:470:ea4a:1:5054:ff:fec7:86e4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6B329E29CE for ; Wed, 7 Feb 2024 11:03:57 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <0d9a35f44a050435d17c755b06dbc439956de674.camel@gentoo.org> Subject: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Gentoo Bugzilla: new resolution for bugs closed due to last rites From: =?UTF-8?Q?Micha=C5=82_G=C3=B3rny?= To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Date: Wed, 07 Feb 2024 12:03:52 +0100 Organization: Gentoo Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-JT6HLKMsdpVzbs5L8oXi" User-Agent: Evolution 3.50.3 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Archives-Salt: 59e29fbe-abd9-4828-9b12-c9400941b56a X-Archives-Hash: d8814bf6872d0442b05d8d74ab2f9fe9 --=-JT6HLKMsdpVzbs5L8oXi Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, I think we should add a new bug resolution that would more precisely cover closing bugs due to packages being removed. Right now, whichever resolution we use (be it WONTFIX, OBSOLETE, etc.), we aren't able to easily distinguish whether the resolution was used "normally" or due to last rites. Having a dedicated resolution (technical name RESO/PKGREMOVED) would make this clear. Furthermore, it would make it easier to reopen bugs if the packages are ever reintroduced. WDYT? --=20 Best regards, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny --=-JT6HLKMsdpVzbs5L8oXi Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQFGBAABCgAwFiEEx2qEUJQJjSjMiybFY5ra4jKeJA4FAmXDY5gSHG1nb3JueUBn ZW50b28ub3JnAAoJEGOa2uIyniQO5c8H/1zVqLupgFsPg9r/8VJmszpf7qSysfrJ DLDzhdeKO0BDx+vdxtaa1FFYPqR40zN+x8TG53O9JcZtiGyAuoluzbMhkuBukqgR SX0zZFJDW/h2uevgMhkYFmd99lPXEpSzXls2BIqk5xD/3QkDJjqMJ8rJBpD0vVRK pd0ZIA96Z8fcDWaYJ2z6W/rVPiXqIPzY7UiFWvXUcqW0gGjMnsuBzUQLq41DRB5n EHFpqW/sAasCRD9UOo8erM8e3uTD63oTAF/AeWOUH9AptQwcjd9u/w4xfSVK+qvI auBBa5/syBVVNIKP6Qb2gzxP6tJbB6eZTM7eo/66kAR0YhXh/3SP6Yw= =aDJi -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-JT6HLKMsdpVzbs5L8oXi--