From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 82BE213832E for ; Fri, 12 Aug 2016 17:40:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CD64E21C17B; Fri, 12 Aug 2016 17:40:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from omr-a002e.mx.aol.com (omr-a002e.mx.aol.com [204.29.186.56]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 00B1121C06C for ; Fri, 12 Aug 2016 17:40:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mtaout-mca01.mx.aol.com (mtaout-mca01.mx.aol.com [172.26.221.77]) by omr-a002e.mx.aol.com (Outbound Mail Relay) with ESMTP id 29C6638000BE for ; Fri, 12 Aug 2016 13:40:40 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [192.168.1.52] (0x5b3139322e3136382e312e35325d [71.122.242.106]) by mtaout-mca01.mx.aol.com (MUA/Third Party Client Interface) with ESMTPA id 8F9BE38000092; Fri, 12 Aug 2016 13:40:39 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] libpcre.so.3 - Compatibility with Debian To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org References: <20160811001053.5b98e44a@symphony.aura-online.co.uk> <22444.18637.297626.134016@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <20160811111141.16bdfcd5@red.yakaraplc.local> <22444.22978.952581.582549@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <1470927479.5563.16.camel@gentoo.org> <4b09dfc4-b6ca-fb1b-adc3-e9c9da766a10@gentoo.org> <20160811205620.6b782217@symphony.aura-online.co.uk> <20160811225053.23f96c15.mgorny@gentoo.org> <20160811172714.3e20c8a9@patrickm> <20160812123216.1e870aaa@katipo2.lan> <20160813033941.5d017bbe@katipo2.lan> From: james Message-ID: <0c155b98-6634-5266-5fef-ae12bf29ab5f@verizon.net> Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2016 12:40:38 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160813033941.5d017bbe@katipo2.lan> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit x-aol-global-disposition: G x-aol-sid: 3039ac1add4d57ae0a17164a X-AOL-IP: 71.122.242.106 X-Archives-Salt: 66d301c5-545b-430f-94ff-0bf00ee9565f X-Archives-Hash: cfeb82eae92590c113667208a6dea010 On 08/12/2016 10:39 AM, Kent Fredric wrote: > On Fri, 12 Aug 2016 09:12:22 -0500 > james wrote: > >> (also, I'm not hung up on 'Jentoo' as a name; perhaps 'Gintoo'? >> >> (peace && hth), >> James > > Way outside the scope needed here. However we pull off Zhenchoo, its > going to be built on top of portage and our package management with > extra bling. > > That's what is necessary to empower people with "ready built" machines > to customize it in the direction of a "natural gentoo install" > > All this converstation details is: > > - Is a given technique good > - Can it be installed in tree without breaking things > - How do we do that > - Is there a place we can do it where the problem is isolated to a > narrow spectrum of users to limit potential fallout > - Is this a "Put warning bells on it and let users blow off their own > feet and then don't do it by default"[1] thing. > - Can this be a "Just package.mask the problem on hardened" thing. > > All of those can be combined in some way to get and end result by > whoever ships the stage 4 the way they want to do it. They can use an > overlay if they want. > > Nothing is stopping them :) > > Other than themselves of course. > That simple huh? Ok, show us a solution based on your dashed items, for the current Valve/Steam/issues, and wrap up those very cool aforementioned games into a stage 4? I'd even settle for a liveDVD on that..... Remember:: Nothing is stopping you, other than yourself of course.... James