From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5AF28158086 for ; Tue, 4 Jan 2022 21:54:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id ACC8C2BC05E; Tue, 4 Jan 2022 21:54:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (woodpecker.gentoo.org [IPv6:2001:470:ea4a:1:5054:ff:fec7:86e4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 026B12BC041 for ; Tue, 4 Jan 2022 21:54:47 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <0bf00be741c0ddc2a2d8b5e5b6b3852097cfb079.camel@gentoo.org> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 1/2] linux-mod.eclass: drop unnecessary IUSE="kernel_linux" From: =?UTF-8?Q?Micha=C5=82_G=C3=B3rny?= To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Cc: kernel@gentoo.org, Sam James Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2022 22:54:42 +0100 In-Reply-To: References: <20220104102348.221452-1-sam@gentoo.org> Organization: Gentoo Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" User-Agent: Evolution 3.42.2 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Archives-Salt: 64c370e7-8e1b-4f63-ace6-56ac06491cf7 X-Archives-Hash: f553fc21b5a69927fdb81de40a660eb3 On Tue, 2022-01-04 at 11:17 -0500, Mike Gilbert wrote: > On Tue, Jan 4, 2022 at 5:23 AM Sam James wrote: > > > > It's already an implicit IUSE, so we don't need this. > > I think it is better to declare it explicitly rather than relying on > the IUSE_IMPLICIT setting in profiles. I agree. Perhaps we should go even further and remove them from implicit flags. -- Best regards, Michał Górny