Re: [gentoo-dev] Using new (masked) qt-x11-3.0.0 ebuild

[Dan Armak <danarmak@gentoo.org>]

On Monday 19 November 2001 15:25, you wrote:
> Hi,
>
> about your CXXFLAGS patch, I'm not so sure I like it. It doesn't cause
> any problems, but it's not according to the qmake specifications. During
> compilation of qt -O3 and -O2 is both passed to gcc since the
> optimization flags are put into another qmake flag. In fact to be really
> correct, the CXXFLAGS should be parsed and each setting should be
> assigned to the correct qmake flags (QMAKE_CC, QMAKE_CFLAGS,
> QMAKE_CFLAGS_DEPS, QMAKE_CFLAGS_WARN_ON, QMAKE_CFLAGS_WARN_OFF,
> QMAKE_CFLAGS_RELEASE, QMAKE_CFLAGS_DEBUG, QMAKE_CFLAGS_SHLIB and
> QMAKE_CFLAGS_THREAD). I don't know however if it's worth the effort of
> parsing the global CXXFLAGS.
Hm. Sounds intimidating :-) I suppose I'll remove the patch for now. BTW I've 
put a similar patch into the qt-2.3.2 ebuild, what do you think of that? I 
don't much mind what I do with the qt-3.0 ebuild, because you're almost 
certainly the only one who's using it right now.

> Yes, the font problems are not due to your doing, but I would definately
> add the -no-xft switch until trolltech resolves this matter. Using xft
> everything really looks horrible and imho unusable. This might then
> again be removed when a next release of qt3 fixes the problem.
You're right; I'll do that.

> Also
> don't forget to update the 45qt-x11-3.0.0 file to use
> /usr/lib/qt-x11-free-3.0.0 instead of /usr/lib/qt-x11-3.0.0.
I've upated the ebuild to install into /usr/lib/qt-x11-3.0.0, so that the 
45... file is correct.

-- 

Dan Armak
Gentoo Linux Developer, Desktop Team
Matan, Israel