From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28886 invoked by uid 1002); 20 Feb 2003 16:59:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 2861 invoked from network); 20 Feb 2003 16:59:18 -0000 Message-ID: <0965EC92EF999641B60A596DF3A331DF0145DC98@wfmail01.intranet.veridian.com> From: "Martin, Stephen" To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2003 11:48:54 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain Subject: RE: [gentoo-dev] Portage-2.0.47-r2 testing X-Archives-Salt: 8ac40aa0-f6b4-465b-a131-6686c9e23354 X-Archives-Hash: 408b85ae7d1f7ff2a1df32019b58a5ac I believe the system was 1.4_rc1. -----Original Message----- From: MAL [mailto:mal@komcept.com] Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 9:36 AM To: Martin, Stephen Cc: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage-2.0.47-r2 testing Martin, Stephen wrote: > Is 2.0.47-r2 *supposed* to be in stable? I did an emerge -u world today and > it upgraded portage to 47. I too am now having all kinds of problems with > gcc-config. > Supposedly yes :/ I'm sticking with 2.0.46 until someone states what the cause is. Is, or was, your system, gentoo 1.2 ? MAL -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list