From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev-return-1577-arch-gentoo-dev=gentoo.org@gentoo.org>
Received: (qmail 2409 invoked by uid 1002); 20 Feb 2003 16:33:28 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev-unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev-subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Received: (qmail 31250 invoked from network); 20 Feb 2003 16:33:28 -0000
Message-ID: <0965EC92EF999641B60A596DF3A331DF0145DC96@wfmail01.intranet.veridian.com>
From: "Martin, Stephen" <stephen.martin@veridian.com>
To: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2003 11:23:03 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: text/plain
Subject: RE: [gentoo-dev] Portage-2.0.47-r2 testing
X-Archives-Salt: e78cf4e8-430c-49fc-93bd-0fc6e6d4e4a2
X-Archives-Hash: e3a4e949946f36881a201d6f0090d796

Is 2.0.47-r2 *supposed* to be in stable?  I did an emerge -u world today and
it upgraded portage to 47.  I too am now having all kinds of problems with
gcc-config.


--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list