From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8B07F138334 for ; Sat, 19 Oct 2019 03:01:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 65E4DE08CD; Sat, 19 Oct 2019 03:01:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1AC2AE087E for ; Sat, 19 Oct 2019 03:01:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [172.16.0.17] (cpe-72-227-68-175.maine.res.rr.com [72.227.68.175]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: desultory) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BE3E934C037 for ; Sat, 19 Oct 2019 03:01:15 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] The demotivating process of contributing to devmanual To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org References: <7db69bdd30aeaf350f9c70c28abf9d890656d55c.camel@gentoo.org> From: desultory Message-ID: <07d90bd8-59c0-cd93-a5ae-62a1f02cb2d8@gentoo.org> Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2019 23:00:24 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.8.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Archives-Salt: 38f016d5-f565-43c8-9bfe-18585ded9063 X-Archives-Hash: fdeed47d0ffcfa6eccedea92fd7646fc On 10/18/19 01:53, Matt Turner wrote: > On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 9:38 PM desultory wrote: >> > > Since the thread seemed to have already wrapped up with a positive > resolution, I question why you responded in the way you did. > > To quote the original post: On 10/15/19 16:35, Michał Górny wrote: > This time I'm saying enough.