From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3432A158041 for ; Wed, 28 Feb 2024 03:12:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 906E9E2B43; Wed, 28 Feb 2024 03:12:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (woodpecker.gentoo.org [IPv6:2001:470:ea4a:1:5054:ff:fec7:86e4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3BAB3E2B3B for ; Wed, 28 Feb 2024 03:12:52 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <076b8ede8f3e2d6d49571d516132a96a08b4d591.camel@gentoo.org> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: banning "AI"-backed (LLM/GPT/whatever) contributions to Gentoo From: =?UTF-8?Q?Micha=C5=82_G=C3=B3rny?= To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2024 04:12:47 +0100 In-Reply-To: References: Organization: Gentoo Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-sNSJuvc6Q2ecb8/iRNVn" User-Agent: Evolution 3.50.4 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Archives-Salt: 6a4380e9-53fb-40dc-9bd3-8af82376bc7a X-Archives-Hash: 234f8a0a44dd244c81a75b1c9ecd80e6 --=-sNSJuvc6Q2ecb8/iRNVn Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 2024-02-27 at 21:05 -0600, Oskari Pirhonen wrote: > What about cases where someone, say, doesn't have an excellent grasp of > English and decides to use, for example, ChatGPT to aid in writing > documentation/comments (not code) and puts a note somewhere explicitly > mentioning what was AI-generated so that someone else can take a closer > look? >=20 > I'd personally not be the biggest fan of this if it wasn't in something > like a PR or ml post where it could be reviewed before being made final. > But the most impportant part IMO would be being up-front about it. I'm afraid that wouldn't help much. From my experiences, it would be less effort for us to help writing it from scratch, than trying to untangle whatever verbose shit ChatGPT generates. Especially that a person with poor grasp of the language could have trouble telling whether the generated text is actually meaningful. --=20 Best regards, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny --=-sNSJuvc6Q2ecb8/iRNVn Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQFGBAABCgAwFiEEx2qEUJQJjSjMiybFY5ra4jKeJA4FAmXepK8SHG1nb3JueUBn ZW50b28ub3JnAAoJEGOa2uIyniQOWDEH/3NS5SaaWaSK2ieuDUP11dCM8r1eHewq +z53NLmcr5673lsZNPrdtSrHuJZWDZv04L9MPJ5mCTujxCz8cACmQDCd7YRZ7wMI gFEMTm5F5kGhvPfGYq2wUh5jh0sgu/7Hcib78fWBdXU21SuGNFEOqli5I4sYrpHS AlXtoMyJ1klcTIS1f/oI6wOUWH7CiOmpII7DYx2C0/xDc+pcMcY/vEbETNPueX7U qlvC8fT2XoPJcK5U87VD+6tCkNkkTuOJq5NUMc4Qodmkg0MTemxu4SI3Oq1i4B11 YDZY4AZZQ8BflZYZ9oGKqBNj/tAZlfCvEcBPhjNnq9xPqDWbeFNTjaY= =l356 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-sNSJuvc6Q2ecb8/iRNVn--