From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-dev+bounces-84231-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DDC7B1382C5
for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Fri, 23 Mar 2018 10:19:04 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 912A6E08E5;
Fri, 23 Mar 2018 10:18:58 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-wm0-x244.google.com (mail-wm0-x244.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::244])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 175C5E0839
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 23 Mar 2018 10:18:57 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-wm0-x244.google.com with SMTP id x82so2548819wmg.1
for <gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 23 Mar 2018 03:18:57 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version
:in-reply-to;
bh=HG8dJI6BASGla6TT8MoQxyvmAd7Cm/b20I9etNh5lMA=;
b=XF/U/Kk409faDk6Dq/BK8miwglIFemljSqCboT5Ey2d7kdfB4JZqEAL18CL7xt2UhG
/7zaXYjvdNxIUha/5rrI6nOkNSs8NuVdlUnVPmT42U+Ngv1/1BIU/y28LmCtcx3Qka7q
VaTz4bVIKLUWbnsAVUQOULWXt87Qpy447smaXZmw1KtEzK1Eoe/P0wfgJiByaflNUPh9
NCzfEo0mmZ3SC4ow+d2EsjuVjS3CVO5rof5DOsDAJa9YbVv6GLzlNfbPwE0sCbDrnHQD
exHGqflpUSrBgSP6SkSeQPOUBrpv5JxFpHTf1VV0nenxNhT4FCjXlr77+qwgoplv026p
20dw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date
:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to;
bh=HG8dJI6BASGla6TT8MoQxyvmAd7Cm/b20I9etNh5lMA=;
b=OFkEFQhZCYPELrwFIGTr955B7UDGEd0siYut95WpYF21ju1I2xjv4FaY1Az3ZaTE+X
jRET5d7tr0LAEsVfLvG8t6Tw1T0l9075fme9MN/Wn1c7MwjYhapgdC1763+pziOTkEDi
d+F287AsbQtlhdLFcDpzYFI0i2/z5RTk03SDglwWKZ9bswWw3SHiFfrCGE/B5uPVOVh1
bqi0od4kAFoXo0alGlff6Rq27fBDde1mXGT860srIBk3jesULQKUBCyfuErIrBw5cec9
5Lgbrir/QicNjDVm9Om9KxPGJgEW2/L9lxX8GXUG7jd9/PNV5Zb2yhAIp+uz2Vp+uqiA
ZCtA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AElRT7E/d2LXOzyv9k742mnXVN2cb43IMrZSGVlSehgURQrrFTD4XIox
rVgbZ7KduPmilnT9t6tRvUnCV+Fy
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AG47ELv6VnkB2IkL1eiwSjApIH55ybLOenOz8111Gtcp/g1zHQYSzoD3JDMn1G03w/GGKpXk1lAWpg==
X-Received: by 10.28.249.21 with SMTP id x21mr8523111wmh.114.1521800336362;
Fri, 23 Mar 2018 03:18:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2a01:4f8:130:732f::200:1002? ([2a01:4f8:130:732f::200:1002])
by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id i78sm436246wmc.32.2018.03.23.03.18.55
(version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
Fri, 23 Mar 2018 03:18:55 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] New Portage fork: sys-apps/portage-mgorny
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org, Ulrich Mueller <ulm@gentoo.org>
References: <1521745426.836.25.camel@gentoo.org> <20180322214732.GA4096@eddy>
<1521756383.23424.0.camel@gentoo.org>
<CAJW3CewVM7WWxAEUcxGqraCnkkhRLnoqgbqcdUU4Zcv=zNy-0w@mail.gmail.com>
<23220.52565.280134.566970@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de>
From: Francesco Riosa <vivo75@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <0559e21f-edcb-986f-0a0b-1bc54bc169a6@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2018 11:18:45 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/52.6.0
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-dev+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-dev.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <23220.52565.280134.566970@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;
protocol="application/pgp-signature";
boundary="nLizeZyXBk2QyQZ6gAJSMyXeJ96HrKWNg"
X-Archives-Salt: bd376e61-ff26-42d4-8b63-1beee01c7fde
X-Archives-Hash: f4bef3b267ddca61adb29a71ed584804
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156)
--nLizeZyXBk2QyQZ6gAJSMyXeJ96HrKWNg
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="YZnPIvGARtwhYc6IXpRZeJ8ncHAietKgs";
protected-headers="v1"
From: Francesco Riosa <vivo75@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org, Ulrich Mueller <ulm@gentoo.org>
Message-ID: <0559e21f-edcb-986f-0a0b-1bc54bc169a6@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] New Portage fork: sys-apps/portage-mgorny
References: <1521745426.836.25.camel@gentoo.org> <20180322214732.GA4096@eddy>
<1521756383.23424.0.camel@gentoo.org>
<CAJW3CewVM7WWxAEUcxGqraCnkkhRLnoqgbqcdUU4Zcv=zNy-0w@mail.gmail.com>
<23220.52565.280134.566970@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de>
In-Reply-To: <23220.52565.280134.566970@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de>
--YZnPIvGARtwhYc6IXpRZeJ8ncHAietKgs
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Language: en-US
Il 23/03/2018 10:48, Ulrich Mueller ha scritto:
>>>>>> On Thu, 22 Mar 2018, Geaaru wrote:
>> for both portage and your fork I think that could be interesting add
>> an extension to PMS for define inside profiles or targets masking of
>> packages of a particular repslository. Currently PMS doesn't permit
>> this but have this feature could be help users to define our
>> profiles under overlays.
>> Something like this:
>> sys-devel/gcc::gentoo
> Conceptually that makes no sense. sys-devel/gcc is the name of an
> upstream package, so what does it even mean to mask it in one
> repository but not in another? If it's the same package, then it
> should behave in the same way, regardless of the repository its ebuild
> it hosted in (or the package being installed, in which case it is no
> longer in an ebuild repository).
>
> If it is a different package however, then it should have a different
> name.
Sorry to say it bluntly but this make no sense at all, even changing a
USE flag make the package behave wildly differently.
Once we agree that an upstream (complex enough) package may have
different incarnations two ebuilds from different maintainers may please
differently the user.
I'm not sure this choice belong to profiles but not because same
upstream correspond to same files on filesystem.
>
> Ulrich
--YZnPIvGARtwhYc6IXpRZeJ8ncHAietKgs--
--nLizeZyXBk2QyQZ6gAJSMyXeJ96HrKWNg
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEu3/c8EeAZHgVZqRJllZPqLObhcQFAlq01I0ACgkQllZPqLOb
hcTBHAgAlA4Wl1GBceIzknxZXwFGx4hPRK0cCzcJ92zBYBZBkxyHDDT8XFiPkdmT
wvoVo4Af2IhSnDuLlZRIT91uLBIYzW3wz8NC8eXsS3v3pSjiAs6zs4HC7bOVznMG
RWLnAILQUA+sQ4oXOILU9Hj8mlXZ34b5hQbQ8bnhZSyD2apJijWd5ePtJB0R1HGa
COJv4LPi2r2DYLaDePcn71HDcHrn08cOHg8h4rsrVFhh7knJR1hUBYH8etpavZlT
c9UJV7fLQEGv7RrkR3Hau82MrlJSX5xaJ4ErGrjDZBNHbehCLnwNol4qecXYRDsx
vrZeFn4VlPm3jip0cE3ANJbRzn8swg==
=HEcX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--nLizeZyXBk2QyQZ6gAJSMyXeJ96HrKWNg--