From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F44F138247 for ; Wed, 18 Dec 2013 16:29:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5D5DEE0A90; Wed, 18 Dec 2013 16:29:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from latimerie.flaska.net (latimerie.flaska.net [46.28.111.182]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6AE63E0A6A for ; Wed, 18 Dec 2013 16:29:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: by latimerie.flaska.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 7C82760407; Wed, 18 Dec 2013 17:29:41 +0100 (CET) From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Jan_Kundr=E1t?= To: Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] How to support C++11 in =?iso-8859-1?Q?libraries=3F?= Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2013 17:29:36 +0100 User-Agent: Trojita/v0.3.96-150-gecf3619-dirty; Qt/4.8.5; X11; Linux; Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <04adfe90-a18b-45d5-9f81-90070c5090c0@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <86sitqtg5s.fsf@moguhome00.in.awa.tohoku.ac.jp> References: <20131218085447.56d1e133@gentoo.org> <86sitqtg5s.fsf@moguhome00.in.awa.tohoku.ac.jp> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: 5c0178e2-b345-4d19-9403-bc5328578372 X-Archives-Hash: b79e6b4bdfc911d5b8699f250959f1f0 On Wednesday, 18 December 2013 14:58:07 CEST, heroxbd@gentoo.org wrote: > I think it is better achieved by a (simple and stupid) global > CXXFLAGS. Adding an extra USE flag feels a little over-engineering. What compiler flag do you propose to use? Note that --std=3Dc++11 will not=20= work. Cheers, Jan