From: "Thomas T. Veldhouse" <veldy@veldy.net>
To: "Kim Nielsen" <kn@insecurity.dk>, <gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo-sources vs "stock" kernels
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2003 13:48:12 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <030901c2c318$5d1390f0$0605010a@VELDYT> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20030123194106.GA9824@localhost
I don't think there is any such intent. By what I can see and know about
Gentoo, it is for any use that one sees fit. It was never designed for any
particular application.
Now in reality ... Gentoo is bleeding edge (and I have seen bloodying on
occasion) and it is up to the administrator to make sure that gentoo changes
don't hose a production machine.
Tom Veldhouse
----- Original Message -----
From: "Kim Nielsen" <kn@insecurity.dk>
To: <gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>
Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 1:41 PM
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo-sources vs "stock" kernels
The gentoo kernel is quite stable but Gentoo was never ment as a server
distribution even though it serves just as well as others like Redhat or
Debian.
It was intedned for network/developer use
/Kim
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-01-23 19:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-01-23 19:05 [gentoo-dev] Gentoo-sources vs "stock" kernels Dewet Diener
2003-01-23 19:16 ` Peter Ruskin
2003-01-23 19:20 ` Kim Nielsen
2003-01-23 19:33 ` Dewet Diener
2003-01-23 19:41 ` Kim Nielsen
2003-01-23 19:48 ` Thomas T. Veldhouse [this message]
2003-01-23 19:55 ` Kim Nielsen
2003-01-23 20:02 ` Thomas T. Veldhouse
2003-01-23 20:08 ` Kim Nielsen
2003-01-23 20:21 ` Thomas T. Veldhouse
2003-01-23 21:25 ` Paul de Vrieze
2003-01-23 21:28 ` Thomas T. Veldhouse
2003-01-23 21:33 ` Paul de Vrieze
2003-01-23 21:41 ` Thomas T. Veldhouse
2003-01-23 21:20 ` Paul de Vrieze
2003-01-24 0:23 ` [gentoo-dev] Gentoo-sources vs "stock" kernels Troy Dack
2003-01-24 0:58 ` Thomas T. Veldhouse
2003-01-23 20:06 ` [gentoo-dev] Gentoo-sources vs "stock" kernels Mike Lundy
2003-01-25 2:04 ` Peter Ruskin
2003-01-23 19:34 ` Dylan Carlson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='030901c2c318$5d1390f0$0605010a@VELDYT' \
--to=veldy@veldy.net \
--cc=gentoo-dev@gentoo.org \
--cc=kn@insecurity.dk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox