From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B41DF138222 for ; Wed, 4 May 2016 12:58:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5B97D22417D; Wed, 4 May 2016 12:57:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 227F22240DF for ; Wed, 4 May 2016 12:57:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.178.49] (p4FF0924B.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [79.240.146.75]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mrueg) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BC4CB340836 for ; Wed, 4 May 2016 12:57:52 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Transitioning from #!/sbin/runscript to,#!/sbin/openrc-run To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org References: <57297A4F.3020803@gentoo.org> <22313.40676.616721.839369@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <5729A9DD.8010305@gentoo.org> <22313.44037.400256.429688@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <30cca0af-c585-7658-a16a-16ec249b76e2@gentoo.org> From: =?UTF-8?Q?Manuel_R=c3=bcger?= Message-ID: <02c1cbc8-a315-b353-a2f0-789f0d554aa6@gentoo.org> Date: Wed, 4 May 2016 14:57:43 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.0 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <30cca0af-c585-7658-a16a-16ec249b76e2@gentoo.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="3rmGWa7Vtc5qcTt45mugQEExiDdudPS42" X-Archives-Salt: 7294b8a1-5566-454d-9d80-2f01f9cac963 X-Archives-Hash: 8f1a9b43831f9409d3f86a965c7760b7 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --3rmGWa7Vtc5qcTt45mugQEExiDdudPS42 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="4Wxa14mn0wpa2fvBVWUj5cHXQmiptFWRn" From: =?UTF-8?Q?Manuel_R=c3=bcger?= To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Message-ID: <02c1cbc8-a315-b353-a2f0-789f0d554aa6@gentoo.org> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Transitioning from #!/sbin/runscript to,#!/sbin/openrc-run References: <57297A4F.3020803@gentoo.org> <22313.40676.616721.839369@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <5729A9DD.8010305@gentoo.org> <22313.44037.400256.429688@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <30cca0af-c585-7658-a16a-16ec249b76e2@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <30cca0af-c585-7658-a16a-16ec249b76e2@gentoo.org> --4Wxa14mn0wpa2fvBVWUj5cHXQmiptFWRn Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 04.05.2016 14:54, Manuel R=C3=BCger wrote: > On 04.05.2016 11:19, Duncan wrote: >> Ulrich Mueller posted on Wed, 04 May 2016 10:00:05 +0200 as excerpted:= >> >>>>>>>> On Wed, 4 May 2016, Austin English wrote: >>> >>>>> Your list of affected packages obtained with "git grep" in the Port= age >>>>> tree will not be complete, since the command won't catch any init >>>>> scripts installed from elsewhere. You should look for the set of >>>>> installed files instead. >>> >>>> How is that relevant here at all? I'm cleaning up portage installed >>>> init scripts, [...] >>> >>> You are cleaning up only those init scripts that are installed from >>> FILESDIR, but you will miss the ones that are installed from a file i= n >>> SRC_URI. >> >> While you are correct, the current problem isn't lack of low hanging=20 >> fruit to fix in the files dir, as he said there's 700 packages on the = >> list already, too many to file individual bugs for. >> >> So while it is indeed worthwhile to keep in mind the init-scripts=20 >> installed from SRC_URI... >> >> There's seven hundred "miles of open road" to cross before we have to = >> worry about that SRC_URI bridge, so maybe worry about that when we're = >> within 50 or 100, or even a couple hundred, "miles", not 700. =3D:^] >> >=20 > Hi Austin, >=20 > to be honest, I'm not too happy with the fixes you applied. > Although it's just a tiny change, I'd rather have expected a revision > bump to the ebuilds and a revision bump to the init files themselves > than just a in-file rewrite. > Your fix changes the content of files that are installed to ones system= =2E > Such a change usually requires a revbump. >=20 >=20 > Cheers, >=20 > Manuel >=20 >=20 Nevermind, I didn't see the follow-up commit in which you removed the old revision. Cheers, Manuel --4Wxa14mn0wpa2fvBVWUj5cHXQmiptFWRn-- --3rmGWa7Vtc5qcTt45mugQEExiDdudPS42 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.1 iQF8BAEBCgBmBQJXKfHHXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXRGNEQyNDdEMTRGNDc0OEQwQTMyQ0MxRjA3 NEQ5Rjc0RUVBQzZBM0IxAAoJEHTZ907qxqOx3BAIAKxSxI7WX1JCgsfqJDFPSYOA wB+j1ph20vf5iGC894izkJU65FqeIXi3hYOWwDDBbx/QMWyQb8ZOqDto6dK66/sC nXtI3vcqMKNW9AzV02WyS7u5DTWcB8WYp9NZOoIRS2VxPIHOa7j4xlJWakGim7B0 dRVsi8oSQQOpFLRj2ty+OfvgCjUsW7qgMfrVPWylhc4VAYeY/qJJtaLoakFgO6+e 3e857U4+02kzjHIzv+0g7zRGazQAIGSFnz+t8EL8DbqN0MXRq0ZjnrSmAmXwhzng z7bG3y3HODRsec6oSaiqfV2Le3MzH7rPu/I95EC7eVqV09u5mnjEB0UlQKPgRBM= =DgS9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --3rmGWa7Vtc5qcTt45mugQEExiDdudPS42--