From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DCDC21382C5 for ; Wed, 10 Feb 2021 21:34:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C48E8E0AF6; Wed, 10 Feb 2021 21:34:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (dev.gentoo.org [IPv6:2001:470:ea4a:1:5054:ff:fec7:86e4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8C388E0AF1 for ; Wed, 10 Feb 2021 21:34:23 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] New project: binhost To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org References: <24819743.1r3eYUQgxm@farino> From: =?UTF-8?Q?Toralf_F=c3=b6rster?= Message-ID: <0224808b-c5bd-c6ac-80d4-58078d856197@gentoo.org> Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2021 22:34:18 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.7.1 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <24819743.1r3eYUQgxm@farino> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="5exDv7g5vboezrxxXlAztWmtON62Bxnfd" X-Archives-Salt: c7a82955-b7c9-49e0-ad1d-80edef480f9b X-Archives-Hash: 1c4d681b94595485f714e6eb0261db52 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --5exDv7g5vboezrxxXlAztWmtON62Bxnfd Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="Jm0kd7z4klmoAEuRJHfidof5qQcO3RZgv"; protected-headers="v1" From: =?UTF-8?Q?Toralf_F=c3=b6rster?= To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org Message-ID: <0224808b-c5bd-c6ac-80d4-58078d856197@gentoo.org> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] New project: binhost References: <24819743.1r3eYUQgxm@farino> In-Reply-To: <24819743.1r3eYUQgxm@farino> --Jm0kd7z4klmoAEuRJHfidof5qQcO3RZgv Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2/10/21 6:57 PM, Andreas K. H=C3=BCttel wrote: > Comments, ideas, flamebaits? :D I'd appreciate bin packages from a user perspective too. With -j1 I do have compile times of about 1 day and more for few packages= =2E But the topic "repoducible builds" is lurking around the corner! --=20 Toralf PGP 23217DA7 9B888F45 --Jm0kd7z4klmoAEuRJHfidof5qQcO3RZgv-- --5exDv7g5vboezrxxXlAztWmtON62Bxnfd Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="OpenPGP_signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="OpenPGP_signature" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- wsB5BAABCAAjFiEE9Fss6CRzaFtvbcqtIyF9p5uIj0UFAmAkUVoFAwAAAAAACgkQIyF9p5uIj0U3 ZAgAgX1yoRmamKsY2TaOg+Uus6ez1V9gamg9fLKCF3LvjnlZbwjeGy+oKTWqq5D6af2mplEqQ8i4 khD1iJgT8Hy2cPrgvzrByQXa8LTfMMv94vP5mTdA6fmp9l4nb8Q8RxNMOizN1PAbI1RGbHsYWcOa JnBoUf74+TA+7RT9VUq+HY+gZqnzVjY9GZZ8QaRG4CcRJvQJbB0HPVHIucAY7Df2dUmuVRrNqozm o18EdNCYOg0r42aknTzrO2bmSLELwZ0ZvqcfQTF87mkCS+0mq0p6LzdlWO+UdIyq0CyfYA0j+4Zo euZS6XHkTOMfhqU+z9pE10I5cdWK96YYPlVMbHFzXA== =acJ0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --5exDv7g5vboezrxxXlAztWmtON62Bxnfd--