[gentoo-dev] alsa 0.9.0_rc3

[gentoo-dev] alsa 0.9.0_rc3

[Spider]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 273 bytes --]

okay, I've been running this since it was released now, and I've found
no problems with it.. I propose we unmask it.

//Spider

--
begin  .signature
This is a .signature virus! Please copy me into your .signature!
See Microsoft KB Article Q265230 for more information.
end

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] alsa 0.9.0_rc3

[Thomas T. Veldhouse]

I second that.  It actually works better than rc2 for emu10k1 cards.  There
was some distortion with rc2 that seems to be fixed in rc3.

Tom Veldhouse

----- Original Message -----
From: "Spider" <spider@gentoo.org>
To: <agenkin@gentoo.org>
Cc: "gentoo-dev" <gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>
Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 11:07 AM
Subject: [gentoo-dev] alsa 0.9.0_rc3

okay, I've been running this since it was released now, and I've found
no problems with it.. I propose we unmask it.

//Spider

--
begin  .signature
This is a .signature virus! Please copy me into your .signature!
See Microsoft KB Article Q265230 for more information.
end

Re: [gentoo-dev] alsa 0.9.0_rc3

[agenkin]

"Thomas T. Veldhouse" <veldy@veldy.net> writes:

> I second that.  It actually works better than rc2 for emu10k1 cards.
> There was some distortion with rc2 that seems to be fixed in rc3.

There are *build time* problems with the alsa-driver package for rc3
(bug #7291).  This is the only reason that the rc3 ebuilds are still
masked.  If the driver compiles for you, then, indeed, it works very
nicely.

Note that at some point another dev unmasked rc3 by accident.  Within
the next several hours I received three bug reports of failed
compilations. ;^)  So, in other words, I don't feel right about
unmasking rc3 quite yet.
-- 
Arcady Genkin : CDF sysadmin : http://cdf.toronto.edu/~agenkin/contact.html

guilt is the cause of more disauders
than history's most obscene marorders                       (E.E. Cummings)

Mailing list resending messages? [was Re: [gentoo-dev] alsa 0.9.0_rc3]

[Thomas T. Veldhouse]

I received this message a couple of days ago.

Tom Veldhouse

----- Original Message -----
From: <agenkin@thpoon.com>
To: <gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>
Cc: "Spider" <spider@gentoo.org>; "Thomas T. Veldhouse" <veldy@veldy.net>
Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 12:04 PM
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] alsa 0.9.0_rc3


> "Thomas T. Veldhouse" <veldy@veldy.net> writes:
>
> > I second that.  It actually works better than rc2 for emu10k1 cards.
> > There was some distortion with rc2 that seems to be fixed in rc3.
>
> There are *build time* problems with the alsa-driver package for rc3
> (bug #7291).  This is the only reason that the rc3 ebuilds are still
> masked.  If the driver compiles for you, then, indeed, it works very
> nicely.
>
> Note that at some point another dev unmasked rc3 by accident.  Within
> the next several hours I received three bug reports of failed
> compilations. ;^)  So, in other words, I don't feel right about
> unmasking rc3 quite yet.
> --
> Arcady Genkin : CDF sysadmin :
http://cdf.toronto.edu/~agenkin/contact.html
>
> guilt is the cause of more disauders
> than history's most obscene marorders                       (E.E.
Cummings)
> _______________________________________________
> gentoo-dev mailing list
> gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
> http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev
>

Re: [gentoo-dev] alsa 0.9.0_rc3

[Joachim Blaabjerg]

On Wednesday 23 October 2002 18:07, Spider wrote:
> okay, I've been running this since it was released now, and I've found
> no problems with it.. I propose we unmask it.
>
> //Spider

Actually, alsa 0.9.0_rc4 was just released. I've been following the alsa-dev 
list, though, and people seem to have problems compiling alsa-lib.

But yes, rc3 works perfectly here, too.

Re: [gentoo-dev] alsa 0.9.0_rc3

[Greg Corcoran]

I would further endorse that as RC2 does not work on my laptop which has
a ymfpci card. RC3 works great.

Greg


On Wed, 2002-10-23 at 09:07, Spider wrote:
> okay, I've been running this since it was released now, and I've found
> no problems with it.. I propose we unmask it.
> 
> //Spider
> 

Re: [gentoo-dev] alsa 0.9.0_rc3

[Michael R. Gayeski II]

On Wednesday 23 October 2002 11:07, Spider wrote:
> okay, I've been running this since it was released now, and I've found
> no problems with it.. I propose we unmask it.
 
I too have been running it since release, and have had no problems with either 
my laptop or desktop machines. So I guess I second this proposal.

Mike "cuisinart" Gayeski

Re: [gentoo-dev] alsa 0.9.0_rc3

[Louis-Philippe Brochu]

Spider wrote:

> okay, I've been running this since it was released now, and I've found
> no problems with it.. I propose we unmask it.
>
> //Spider
>
> --
> begin  .signature
> This is a .signature virus! Please copy me into your .signature!
> See Microsoft KB Article Q265230 for more information.
> end

I too have been running rc3 for a while without any problem. It was 
necessary for my Hercules Game Theater XP card to work. I had to 
./configure and make manually to enable the new DSP hacks however...


--
Louis-Philippe Brochu