From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32368 invoked by uid 1002); 3 Jun 2003 13:19:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gentoo-dev-help@gentoo.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org Received: (qmail 9817 invoked from network); 3 Jun 2003 13:19:12 -0000 Message-ID: <011c01c329d2$d4165450$1b2a10ac@victoria> From: "Tobias J. Schwinger" To: "foser" Cc: References: <007d01c32935$2c700450$1b2a10ac@victoria> <1054590273.8196.9.camel@rivendell> Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2003 15:19:48 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0117_01C329E3.92383CE0" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] typo in sawfish-2.0 source X-Archives-Salt: 3cafc539-d995-4bbf-a5c9-05d25b8831ed X-Archives-Hash: 7a4fe1334b0c63983613d0ad0d2ee463 ------=_NextPart_000_0117_01C329E3.92383CE0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable ----- Original Message -----=20 From: "foser" To: Sent: 02 June, 2003 23:44 Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] typo in sawfish-2.0 source > The check was ok around the time sawfish-2.0 was released around the > time gtk+-2.0 hit the streets, but isn't correct anymore with gtk+-2.2 > in the tree. Your check isn't completely correct either, cause sawfish > will work with gtk+-2.0 just fine (it checks the minor version no.). OH ! I REALIZE THAT WAS STUPID - I'M SORRY I DIDN'T WANT TO CONFUSE = ANYONE. thanx for pointing it out. ------=_NextPart_000_0117_01C329E3.92383CE0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
----- Original Message -----
From: "foser" <foser@foser.dyn.warande.net>
To: <gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>
Sent: 02 June, 2003 23:44
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] typo in = sawfish-2.0=20 source

> The check was ok around the time = sawfish-2.0=20 was released around the
> time gtk+-2.0 hit the streets, but isn't = correct=20 anymore with gtk+-2.2
> in the tree. Your check isn't completely = correct=20 either, cause sawfish
> will work with gtk+-2.0 just fine (it = checks the=20 minor version no.).
 
OH !  I REALIZE THAT WAS STUPID - = I'M SORRY I=20 DIDN'T WANT TO CONFUSE ANYONE.
 
thanx for pointing it out.
 
------=_NextPart_000_0117_01C329E3.92383CE0--