[gentoo-dev] gentoo 0.5.2.ebuild failure

[gentoo-dev] gentoo 0.5.2.ebuild failure

[Collins Richey]

I'm using the following for ebuild

#P=
A=${PN}-0.5.2.tar.bz2
S=${WORKDIR}/${PN}-0.52.
# everything after this point identical to 0.5.0.ebuild
DESCRIPTION="A lightweight email client and newsreader"
SRC_URI="http://sylpheed.good-day.net/sylpheed/${A}"
HOMEPAGE="http://sylpheed.good-day.net"

DEPEND=">=x11-libs/gtk+-1.2
        >=media-libs/compface-1.4
        gnome? ( >=media-libs/gdk-pixbuf-0.10 )
        nls? ( sys-devel/gettext )"

RDEPEND=">=x11-libs/gtk+-1.2
        gnome? ( >=media-libs/gdk-pixbuf-0.10 )"

src_compile() {

    local myconf
    if [ -z "`use gnome`" ] ; then
        myconf="--disable-gdk-pixbuf --disable-imlib"
    fi
    if [ -z "`use nls`" ] ; then
        myconf="$myconf --disable-nls"
    fi
    try ./configure --prefix=/usr/X11R6 --host=${CHOST} --enable-ipv6
$myconf
    try make

}

src_install () {

    try make prefix=${D}/usr manualdir=${D}/usr/share/doc/${PF}/html
install
    dodoc AUTHORS COPYING ChangeLog* NEWS README* TODO*


I did these steps
1) created the ebuild
2) ebuild sylpheed-0.5.2.ebuild fetch
3) ebuild sylpheed-0.5.2.ebuild digest
4) emerge sylpheed-0.5.2.ebuild
 
}

When I run emerge I get
>>> emerge net-mail/sylpheed-0.5.2 to /
>>> md5 ;-) sylpheed-0.5.2.tar.bz2
>>> Unpacking source...
>>> Unpacking sylpheed-0.5.2.tar.bz2
>>> Source unpacked.
/usr/sbin/ebuild.sh: ./configure: No such file or directory

!!! ERROR: the ./configure command did not complete successfully.
!!! ("./configure --prefix=/usr/X11R6 --host=i486-pc-linux-gnu
--enable-ipv6")
!!! Since this is a critical task, ebuild will be stopped.

!!! emerge aborting on 
/usr/portage/net-mail/sylpheed/sylpheed-0.5.2.ebuild .

The source in /usr/tmp/portage/sylpheed-0.5.2/work/sylpheed-0.5.2 looks
normal, and there is a configure file.

Any clues?

-- 
Collins Richey
Denver Area
Gentoo_rc5 XFCE

Re: [gentoo-dev] gentoo 0.5.2.ebuild failure

[Daniel Robbins]

On Sun, Aug 05, 2001 at 03:22:51PM +0000, Collins Richey wrote:

> The source in /usr/tmp/portage/sylpheed-0.5.2/work/sylpheed-0.5.2 looks
> normal, and there is a configure file.
> 
> Any clues?

Yes; the S= setting has a trailing period.

-- 
Daniel Robbins					<drobbins@gentoo.org>
Chief Architect/President			http://www.gentoo.org 
Gentoo Technologies, Inc.			

Re: [gentoo-dev] gentoo 0.5.2.ebuild failure

[Collins Richey]

On Sun, 5 Aug 2001 15:22:06 -0600 Daniel Robbins <drobbins@gentoo.org>
wrote:

> On Sun, Aug 05, 2001 at 03:22:51PM +0000, Collins Richey wrote:
> 
> > The source in /usr/tmp/portage/sylpheed-0.5.2/work/sylpheed-0.5.2
> looks
> > normal, and there is a configure file.
> > 
> > Any clues?
> 
> Yes; the S= setting has a trailing period.
> 
> -- 

Thanks.  

The only delta required from sylpheed-0.5.0.ebuild to ...0.5.2.... are the
following lines.

A=${PN}-0.5.2.tar.bz2
S=${WORKDIR}/${PN}-0.5.2

I am using gentoo_rc5 with portage 1.5.2 and a default /etc/make.conf. 
Someone might want to look and see if it builds with other use and/or cpu
options, although I doubt any problems - I've never had any problems with
sylpheed incremental releases.

-- 
Collins Richey
Denver Area
Gentoo_rc5 XFCE

Re: [gentoo-dev] gentoo 0.5.2.ebuild failure

[Dan Armak]

On Monday 06 August 2001 00:22, you wrote:
> On Sun, 5 Aug 2001 15:22:06 -0600 Daniel Robbins <drobbins@gentoo.org>
>
> wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 05, 2001 at 03:22:51PM +0000, Collins Richey wrote:
> > > The source in /usr/tmp/portage/sylpheed-0.5.2/work/sylpheed-0.5.2
> >
> > looks
> >
> > > normal, and there is a configure file.
> > >
> > > Any clues?
> >
> > Yes; the S= setting has a trailing period.
> >
> > --
>
> Thanks.
>
> The only delta required from sylpheed-0.5.0.ebuild to ...0.5.2.... are the
> following lines.
>
> A=${PN}-0.5.2.tar.bz2
> S=${WORKDIR}/${PN}-0.5.2
>
> I am using gentoo_rc5 with portage 1.5.2 and a default /etc/make.conf.
> Someone might want to look and see if it builds with other use and/or cpu
> options, although I doubt any problems - I've never had any problems with
> sylpheed incremental releases.
OK, sorry about not responding yesterday - I was asleep (different time 
zones). Anyway, I'll add this to incoming, hopefully since it's just an 
update it'll be into cvs in a day or two.

BTW, drobbins, IMHO we should do something special with incoming updates, 
since they can be checked in and tested quicker than a new ebuild, but only 
by the original ebuild's author or someone who knows the package well. Maybe 
a change in dev-wiki - adding items to other developers (maybe only for 
incoming) or, failing that, having all unassigned team todos show up on the 
main team page. What do you think? Maybe I'm just making too much o the 
incoming buisiness?



-- 

Dan Armak
Gentoo Linux Developer, Desktop Team
Matan, Israel

Re: [gentoo-dev] gentoo 0.5.2.ebuild failure

[Dan Armak]

On Monday 06 August 2001 08:18, you wrote:
> On Monday 06 August 2001 00:22, you wrote:
> > On Sun, 5 Aug 2001 15:22:06 -0600 Daniel Robbins <drobbins@gentoo.org>
> >
> > wrote:
> > > On Sun, Aug 05, 2001 at 03:22:51PM +0000, Collins Richey wrote:
> > > > The source in /usr/tmp/portage/sylpheed-0.5.2/work/sylpheed-0.5.2
> > >
> > > looks
> > >
> > > > normal, and there is a configure file.
> > > >
> > > > Any clues?
> > >
> > > Yes; the S= setting has a trailing period.
> > >
> > > --
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > The only delta required from sylpheed-0.5.0.ebuild to ...0.5.2.... are
> > the following lines.
> >
> > A=${PN}-0.5.2.tar.bz2
> > S=${WORKDIR}/${PN}-0.5.2
> >
> > I am using gentoo_rc5 with portage 1.5.2 and a default /etc/make.conf.
> > Someone might want to look and see if it builds with other use and/or cpu
> > options, although I doubt any problems - I've never had any problems with
> > sylpheed incremental releases.
>
> OK, sorry about not responding yesterday - I was asleep (different time
> zones). Anyway, I'll add this to incoming, hopefully since it's just an
> update it'll be into cvs in a day or two.
>
What I meant to say was, I can test compiling, but not much of usage. So we 
should message a developer directly.


-- 

Dan Armak
Gentoo Linux Developer, Desktop Team
Matan, Israel

Re: [gentoo-dev] gentoo 0.5.2.ebuild failure

[Dan Armak]

On Monday 06 August 2001 09:07, you wrote:
> On Monday 06 August 2001 08:18, you wrote:
> > On Monday 06 August 2001 00:22, you wrote:
> > > On Sun, 5 Aug 2001 15:22:06 -0600 Daniel Robbins <drobbins@gentoo.org>
> > >
> > > wrote:
> > > > On Sun, Aug 05, 2001 at 03:22:51PM +0000, Collins Richey wrote:
> > > > > The source in /usr/tmp/portage/sylpheed-0.5.2/work/sylpheed-0.5.2
> > > >
> > > > looks
> > > >
> > > > > normal, and there is a configure file.
> > > > >
> > > > > Any clues?
> > > >
> > > > Yes; the S= setting has a trailing period.
> > > >
> > > > --
> > >
> > > Thanks.
> > >
> > > The only delta required from sylpheed-0.5.0.ebuild to ...0.5.2.... are
> > > the following lines.
> > >
> > > A=${PN}-0.5.2.tar.bz2
> > > S=${WORKDIR}/${PN}-0.5.2
> > >
> > > I am using gentoo_rc5 with portage 1.5.2 and a default /etc/make.conf.
> > > Someone might want to look and see if it builds with other use and/or
> > > cpu options, although I doubt any problems - I've never had any
> > > problems with sylpheed incremental releases.
> >
> > OK, sorry about not responding yesterday - I was asleep (different time
> > zones). Anyway, I'll add this to incoming, hopefully since it's just an
> > update it'll be into cvs in a day or two.
>
> What I meant to say was, I can test compiling, but not much of usage. So we
> should message a developer directly.
A very final note: I *can* test this particular case, so I'll do so. What I 
said earlier was about incoming updates in general. Sorry, I'm just mentally 
disorganized right now.


-- 

Dan Armak
Gentoo Linux Developer, Desktop Team
Matan, Israel

Re: [gentoo-dev] gentoo 0.5.2.ebuild failure: summup

[Dan Armak]

After all this, it turned out that Achim already added sylpheed-0.5.2 two 
days ago. Happy ending!


-- 

Dan Armak
Gentoo Linux Developer, Desktop Team
Matan, Israel

Re: [gentoo-dev] gentoo 0.5.2.ebuild failure

[Dan Armak]

On Monday 06 August 2001 08:18, you wrote:
> On Monday 06 August 2001 00:22, you wrote:
> > On Sun, 5 Aug 2001 15:22:06 -0600 Daniel Robbins <drobbins@gentoo.org>
> >
> > wrote:
> > > On Sun, Aug 05, 2001 at 03:22:51PM +0000, Collins Richey wrote:
> > > > The source in /usr/tmp/portage/sylpheed-0.5.2/work/sylpheed-0.5.2
> > >
> > > looks
> > >
> > > > normal, and there is a configure file.
> > > >
> > > > Any clues?
> > >
> > > Yes; the S= setting has a trailing period.
> > >
> > > --
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > The only delta required from sylpheed-0.5.0.ebuild to ...0.5.2.... are
> > the following lines.
> >
> > A=${PN}-0.5.2.tar.bz2
> > S=${WORKDIR}/${PN}-0.5.2
> >
> > I am using gentoo_rc5 with portage 1.5.2 and a default /etc/make.conf.
> > Someone might want to look and see if it builds with other use and/or cpu
> > options, although I doubt any problems - I've never had any problems with
> > sylpheed incremental releases.
>
> OK, sorry about not responding yesterday - I was asleep (different time
> zones). Anyway, I'll add this to incoming, hopefully since it's just an
> update it'll be into cvs in a day or two.
>
Sorry about the multipart messaging. Since this is a quick and easy change 
I'm not adding any files to incoming, just a quick note to dev-wiki for the 
corresponding team.


-- 

Dan Armak
Gentoo Linux Developer, Desktop Team
Matan, Israel