From: Dan Armak <danarmak@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] New system to replace USE flags
Date: Thu Jul 19 11:43:08 2001 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <01071920392401.00589@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20010718231521.D32302@cvs.gentoo.org>
On Thursday 19 July 2001 08:15, you wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 19, 2001 at 07:36:08AM +0300, Dan Armak wrote:
> > No, No! This is a proprosition to *replace* USE flags. Thre will be
> > *only* With flags.
>
> I see no reason to replace USE variables when they can be extended in a
> backwards-compatible manner.
>
> > If I want to add a flag to make.*, it gives 2 benefits: 1. The user can
> > customize it in make.conf. 2. It can be part of a group, which can give
> > the user more info and a better default choice in a Which selection.
>
> We already have plans to add groups to USE variables, and a few other
> extensions. And there's no reason to replace the current USE system with
> another one just to add an interactive mode. Why destroy months of work
> we've already completed when the "With" system doesn't give us anything
> special? I really don't see the point of "With" variables. I don't think
> you've clearly explained or convinced me *why* we need them. Everything
> you want is possible with the new USE system.
I didn't mean "replace" them in that sense. I called the new system With
flags to differentiate it from exsiting USE flags. You can call them USE or
anything else. I don't mind extending the existing system, it's better than
building from scratch, as long as hte result is capable of doing the things I
suggested. Likewise the specific syntax examples I gave: I don't say it has
to be like that, I'm just giving an example.
--
Dan Armak
Gentoo Linux Developer
Matan, Israel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-07-19 17:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-07-18 15:11 [gentoo-dev] New system to replace USE flags Sean Mitchell
2001-07-18 22:36 ` Dan Armak
2001-07-18 23:16 ` Daniel Robbins
2001-07-19 11:43 ` Dan Armak [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-07-19 8:29 Sean Mitchell
2001-07-19 8:41 ` Daniel Robbins
2001-07-19 11:43 ` Dan Armak
2001-07-18 14:54 tneidt
2001-07-18 14:12 Dan Armak
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=01071920392401.00589@localhost \
--to=danarmak@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox