public inbox for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dan Armak <danarmak@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] New system to replace USE flags
Date: Thu Jul 19 11:43:08 2001	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <01071920392401.00589@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20010718231521.D32302@cvs.gentoo.org>

On Thursday 19 July 2001 08:15, you wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 19, 2001 at 07:36:08AM +0300, Dan Armak wrote:
> > No, No! This is a proprosition to *replace* USE flags. Thre will be
> > *only* With flags.
>
> I see no reason to replace USE variables when they can be extended in a
> backwards-compatible manner.
>
> > If I want to add a flag to make.*, it gives 2 benefits: 1. The user can
> > customize it in make.conf.  2. It can be part of a group, which can give
> > the user more info and a better default choice in a Which selection.
>
> We already have plans to add groups to USE variables, and a few other
> extensions.  And there's no reason to replace the current USE system with
> another one just to add an interactive mode.  Why destroy months of work
> we've already completed when the "With" system doesn't give us anything
> special?  I really don't see the point of "With" variables.  I don't think
> you've clearly explained or convinced me *why* we need them.  Everything
> you want is possible with the new USE system.
 I didn't mean "replace" them in that sense. I called the new system With 
flags to differentiate it from exsiting USE flags. You can call them USE or 
anything else. I don't mind extending the existing system, it's better than 
building from scratch, as long as hte result is capable of doing the things I 
suggested. Likewise the specific syntax examples I gave: I don't say it has 
to be like that, I'm just giving an example.


-- 

Dan Armak
Gentoo Linux Developer
Matan, Israel



  reply	other threads:[~2001-07-19 17:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-07-18 15:11 [gentoo-dev] New system to replace USE flags Sean Mitchell
2001-07-18 22:36 ` Dan Armak
2001-07-18 23:16   ` Daniel Robbins
2001-07-19 11:43     ` Dan Armak [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-07-19  8:29 Sean Mitchell
2001-07-19  8:41 ` Daniel Robbins
2001-07-19 11:43   ` Dan Armak
2001-07-18 14:54 tneidt
2001-07-18 14:12 Dan Armak

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=01071920392401.00589@localhost \
    --to=danarmak@gentoo.org \
    --cc=gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox