From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-14) on finch.gentoo.org
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.1 required=5.0 tests=DATE_IN_PAST_12_24,DMARC_NONE,
	INVALID_DATE,MAILING_LIST_MULTI autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
	version=4.0.0
Received: from mailgw3.netvision.net.il ([194.90.1.11])
	by cvs.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 3.30 #1)
	id 15L9xo-0006wD-00
	for gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org; Fri, 13 Jul 2001 14:55:04 -0600
Received: from localhost (ras7-p8.rlz.netvision.net.il [62.0.87.8])
	by mailgw3.netvision.net.il (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id XAA17249
	for <gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org>; Fri, 13 Jul 2001 23:52:17 +0300 (IDT)
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
From: Dan Armak <ermak@netvision.net.il>
To: gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] feature request for X ebuild
X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2]
References: <20010713194921.XPVA24207.mail2.rdc2.bc.home.com@storm> <01071323314701.00707@localhost> <20010713154742.A555@minime.sistina.com>
In-Reply-To: <20010713154742.A555@minime.sistina.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <01071323550704.00707@localhost>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: gentoo-dev-admin@cvs.gentoo.org
Errors-To: gentoo-dev-admin@cvs.gentoo.org
X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-dev-request@cvs.gentoo.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-dev@cvs.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://cvs.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev>,
	<mailto:gentoo-dev-request@cvs.gentoo.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux development list <gentoo-dev.cvs.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://cvs.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev>,
	<mailto:gentoo-dev-request@cvs.gentoo.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://cvs.gentoo.org/pipermail/gentoo-dev/>
Date: Fri Jul 13 14:56:02 2001
X-Original-Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2001 23:55:07 +0300
X-Archives-Salt: bb21afd8-88d1-481d-a09f-9b35ae981422
X-Archives-Hash: 810fe016c943571b66dba06cea4e9f16

On Friday 13 July 2001 23:47, you wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 13, 2001 at 11:31:47PM +0300, Dan Armak wrote:
> >have a setting "USE_ALL" that would always build all possible dependencies
> > of
>
> God help us! NO! what a monstrous thing to undertake! Can you imagine
> making a kernel compile with all those conflicting drivers and patches!!!
> It'd be a nightmare. Or building some app that can use GTK or QT compile
> with both (not sure if there are any, that would be stupid) but you get
> my point.

OK, OK! But I still think we need to organize our USE flags.

Dan Armak