From: "Paul Varner" <gentoo-dev@varnerfamily.org>
To: <gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] SuSE Kernel Sources
Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2003 21:30:10 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <00f301c38956$517bb380$8000a8c0@1d36l> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20031003015853.GA7332%chutz@gg3.net
Georgi Georgiev wrote:
> On 02/10/2003 at 20:47:32(-0500), Paul Varner used 5.2K just to say:
>>> 1. The kernel sources are distributed by SuSE as an RPM. The RPM
>>> data is compressed with bzip instead of gzip. I discovered that
>>> rpm2targz doesn't understand bzipped RPM files and would not
>>> correctly process the rpm. Because of this, an explicit dependency
>>> for the kernel is the rpm ebuild. The only thing that is used from
>>> rpm is the rpm2cpio command to unpack the sources into the ebuild
>>> sandbox. I don't use rpm in any other way. The second dependency
>>> is cpio. This one really isn't an issue since it is part of the
>>> system, but to be safe, I included it anyway.
>
> How did you discover that?
>
> Please check the latest version of rpm2targz, bug #23249 and the
> rpm.eclass (in reverse order). You can also take a look at the
> ebuilds for dev-lang/icc and dev-lang/ifc (the first two that come to
> mind) for hints on how to use the rpm.eclass.
I discovered it, because I used the redhat-sources ebuild as my inital
template. When rpm2targz didn't work as expected I read through the script
to debug what it was doing. As I was stepping though the script, I saw that
it was the gunzip part that was failing, so I produced the output up to that
point and saw that I had bzipped data instead of gzipped data.
Additionally, since I saw no reason to create a tar.gz file, just to turn
around and unpack the file, I decided to use rpm2cpio directly.
Anyhow, after seeing your comments on the rpm.eclass, I know what the r1
ebuild will be using! This is not intended as a putdown, but I have had a
hard time finding all of the information that I have been looking for to
build the ebuild. The documentation once I find it is great, but I still
feel like I'm looking for the needle in a haystack right now. I'm sure that
it will get easier over time.
Regards,
Paul
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-10-03 2:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-10-03 1:47 [gentoo-dev] SuSE Kernel Sources Paul Varner
2003-10-03 1:58 ` Georgi Georgiev
2003-10-03 2:30 ` Paul Varner [this message]
2003-10-03 4:17 ` C. Brewer
2003-10-03 6:30 ` Georgi Georgiev
2003-10-03 7:20 ` C. Brewer
2003-10-03 13:15 ` Georgi Georgiev
2003-10-03 17:57 ` C. Brewer
2003-10-04 4:14 ` Georgi Georgiev
2003-10-03 15:10 ` Alastair Tse
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='00f301c38956$517bb380$8000a8c0@1d36l' \
--to=gentoo-dev@varnerfamily.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox