From: "Todd Berman" <tberman@gentoo.org>
To: "'matt c'" <matt@legalizefreedom.org>,
"'gentoo-dev ML'" <gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>
Subject: RE: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo 1.4 final against rc's
Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2003 13:47:05 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <005c01c36355$3dc1d8f0$8500a8c0@PROTON> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <00a801c36354$3ccce710$1401a8c0@punx>
>> Not exactly, you are missing a very important thing your installation
>> had in common with a lot of other peoples.
>>
>> The Portage Tree.
>> Just something to think about :)
>I think you're missing something though - my system (and your system)
also
>have gcc and python and all the neat gnu utilities like awk, and grep,
and
>bash, etc. These are all *different versions* depending on when you
>last --updated them. The portage tree is also *VERY* different based on
when
>you last ran emerge sync - it changes hourly. My portage tree is
different
>than someone who syncd this AM (as I have not done so for about two
weeks,
>my ram blew up! waiting on RMA.:-( ) The absolute lowest common
denominator
>that anyone has is the product they installed from - which are the
various
>stages..
Its not so much that I'm missing that, and more that I am attempting to
introduce a different concept of what might quantify a Gentoo 'Release'.
If the 'Release' was based on a snapshot of the Portage Tree (with
security fixes backported of course, most likely major bug fixes as
well), then there would be something uniform and standard to release
against.
--Todd
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-08-15 17:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-08-15 17:39 [gentoo-dev] Gentoo 1.4 final against rc's matt c
2003-08-15 17:47 ` Todd Berman [this message]
2003-08-15 18:10 ` Paul de Vrieze
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-08-14 19:56 FRLinux
2003-08-14 20:58 ` Spider
2003-08-14 22:20 ` Owen Gunden
2003-08-14 23:08 ` Peter Ruskin
2003-08-15 3:06 ` Zack Gilburd
2003-08-15 6:30 ` C. Brewer
2003-08-15 9:44 ` Camille Huot
2003-08-15 9:54 ` Georgi Georgiev
2003-08-15 10:06 ` Phil Richards
2003-08-15 13:30 ` Chris Gianelloni
2003-08-15 16:41 ` Georgi Georgiev
2003-08-15 11:46 ` William Kenworthy
2003-08-15 13:11 ` Michael Cummings
2003-08-15 17:00 ` matt c
2003-08-15 17:27 ` Todd Berman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='005c01c36355$3dc1d8f0$8500a8c0@PROTON' \
--to=tberman@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@gentoo.org \
--cc=matt@legalizefreedom.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox