From: "Camille Huot" <cam@cameuh.net>
To: "Owen Gunden" <ogunden@stwing.upenn.edu>
Cc: <gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo 1.4 final against rc's
Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2003 11:44:21 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <005801c36311$d18fec50$9865fea9@herakles> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20030814222026.GA16720@force.stwing.upenn.edu
we can just rename "release" to something like "snapshot" to show that this
only is Gentoo at a certain time. ie: "gentoo snap-20030801"
my 2 cents
----- Original Message -----
From: "Owen Gunden" <ogunden@stwing.upenn.edu>
To: <gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>
Sent: Friday, August 15, 2003 12:20 AM
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo 1.4 final against rc's
> On Thu, Aug 14, 2003 at 10:58:35PM +0200, Spider wrote:
> > None, there wouldn't be any difference at all in your system. 1.4 is
> > the package release and the livecd's, not the resulting systems.
>
> This kind of question comes up all the time. I often wonder if it's not a
> waste of effort to try and force gentoo into a notion of "releases", when
> it's so unnatural to do so.
>
> It would be cool to come up with some other, more gentoo-ish way of
> expressing progress in the distribution.
>
> Ideas anyone? Or am I being a total kook?
>
> Owen
>
> --
> gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
>
>
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-08-15 9:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-08-14 19:56 [gentoo-dev] Gentoo 1.4 final against rc's FRLinux
2003-08-14 20:58 ` Spider
2003-08-14 22:20 ` Owen Gunden
2003-08-14 23:08 ` Peter Ruskin
2003-08-15 3:06 ` Zack Gilburd
2003-08-15 6:30 ` C. Brewer
2003-08-15 9:44 ` Camille Huot [this message]
2003-08-15 9:54 ` Georgi Georgiev
2003-08-15 10:06 ` Phil Richards
2003-08-15 13:30 ` Chris Gianelloni
2003-08-15 16:41 ` Georgi Georgiev
2003-08-15 11:46 ` William Kenworthy
2003-08-15 13:11 ` Michael Cummings
2003-08-15 17:00 ` matt c
2003-08-15 17:27 ` Todd Berman
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-08-15 17:39 matt c
2003-08-15 17:47 ` Todd Berman
2003-08-15 18:10 ` Paul de Vrieze
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='005801c36311$d18fec50$9865fea9@herakles' \
--to=cam@cameuh.net \
--cc=gentoo-dev@gentoo.org \
--cc=ogunden@stwing.upenn.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox