From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-14) on finch.gentoo.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.2 required=5.0 tests=DMARC_MISSING, FSL_HELO_NON_FQDN_1,HELO_NO_DOMAIN,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RDNS_DYNAMIC autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=4.0.0 Received: from neptune (modemcable009.129-200-24.mtl.mc.videotron.ca [24.200.129.9]) by chiba.3jane.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C26B2AC609 for ; Sun, 28 Jul 2002 13:27:00 -0500 (CDT) Received: from [192.168.1.1] by neptune (ArGoSoft Mail Server Pro for WinNT/2000/XP, Version 1.8 (1.8.1.6)); Sun, 28 Jul 2002 14:27:08 -0400 From: "Michael Mattsson" To: Subject: RE: [gentoo-dev] GCC 3.1/3.2 Date: Sun, 28 Jul 2002 14:27:07 -0400 Message-ID: <004801c23664$61af67b0$0a01a8c0@neptune> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2616 In-Reply-To: <3D43F0B5.9030203@gentoo.org> Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3590.0000 Sender: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org Errors-To: gentoo-dev-admin@gentoo.org X-BeenThere: gentoo-dev@gentoo.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Gentoo Linux developer list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: X-Archives-Salt: a31735b2-b98c-4980-ad94-006f2d1f673a X-Archives-Hash: 8de3d6200b44294e354cce850a7ddd0b Just curious. Who are you sending patches to? Gentoo scripters, or independent QT/GTK developers? What kind of patches are you refering to? Gcc3.2 or kernel patches? Why arent any patches in the cvs tree? How many questions can I fit onto one paragraph? I'm kind of confused as I thought that pretty much all gentoo related code were script based. If this is not the case, then is it possible to get a list of gentoo specific modules that may be affected by future GCC upgrades? I ask this because I tend to use the latest GCC CVS snapshots for my development (currently gcc 3.1.3). Michael Mattsson Kyrana Inc. michel@kyrana.com > -----Original Message----- > 3.2 is labeled by GNU to be 100% multi-vender compliant with > the C++ ABI > now. Which is the core prob with the new gcc releases. By skipping > straight to 3.2 we'll avoid 2 problem transitions.. 1 from > 2.95 to 3.1 > and then from 3.1/3.1.1 to 3.2 instead we'll have 2.95 to > 3.2. As one of > the gcc-3.1/gcc-3.2 Gentoo guys I support this plan (was one > of the ones > calling for it among the devs) and I'm working hard with all > the other > guys to send upstream patches to developers to make sure their > applications are ready for the new gcc-3.2 platform. (this > will benefit > all distros). > > -- > Doug Goldstein > Developer (Laptops, WiFi, GCC-3.1) > Gentoo Linux > http://www.gentoo.org/~cardoe/ >