From: "matt c" <matt@legalizefreedom.org>
To: <gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo 1.4 final against rc's
Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2003 10:00:24 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <003801c3634e$b8475f70$1401a8c0@punx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20030815131141.GD24578@enki.datanode.net
----- Original Message -----
From: "Michael Cummings" <mcummings@gentoo.org>
Sent: Friday, August 15, 2003 6:11 AM
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo 1.4 final against rc's
> Another 2 cents (can we buy a cup of coffee yet?) -
>
> What about "milestone" instead?
I think this will still cause confusion among the users. Calling Gentoo
anything other than Gentoo (even a milestone or a snapshot) is still giving
it a version number. A version number implies that there is something to be
updated. Sure, the baselayout changes, as does gcc and xfree, etc. But this
is a constantly changing thing - HIGHLY dependant upon your ~arch or lack
thereof, and how often you update packages. Users will still think they need
to "reinstall" or "upgrade" something.
I think that is the strength of Gentoo - no two installations will ever be
even close to the same. How can one put any sort of number on this? By
versioning the stages, we remove any doubt about what people have - one
could say "I installed with Gentoo Stage1-1.4 and I now have a 'Gentoo
System'." How can one put a version number on my system (which is completely
and utterly different than almost any one elses?) The only thing my
installation has in common with anyone elses is that I installed from the
same stage and stage version as others did.
Matt
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-08-15 17:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-08-14 19:56 [gentoo-dev] Gentoo 1.4 final against rc's FRLinux
2003-08-14 20:58 ` Spider
2003-08-14 22:20 ` Owen Gunden
2003-08-14 23:08 ` Peter Ruskin
2003-08-15 3:06 ` Zack Gilburd
2003-08-15 6:30 ` C. Brewer
2003-08-15 9:44 ` Camille Huot
2003-08-15 9:54 ` Georgi Georgiev
2003-08-15 10:06 ` Phil Richards
2003-08-15 13:30 ` Chris Gianelloni
2003-08-15 16:41 ` Georgi Georgiev
2003-08-15 11:46 ` William Kenworthy
2003-08-15 13:11 ` Michael Cummings
2003-08-15 17:00 ` matt c [this message]
2003-08-15 17:27 ` Todd Berman
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-08-15 17:39 matt c
2003-08-15 17:47 ` Todd Berman
2003-08-15 18:10 ` Paul de Vrieze
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='003801c3634e$b8475f70$1401a8c0@punx' \
--to=matt@legalizefreedom.org \
--cc=gentoo-dev@gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox