Re: [gentoo-dev] gcc without ada,f77,objc ?

["Achim Gottinger" <achim@gentoo.org>]

> that would be a nice idea... we didn't need more USE flags and could give
the
> seperated packages a special name like gcc-f77, gcc-java and so on.
>
> maybe there are some people around who want to do this work... if not, i'm
> really interested in helping out... maybe there are some people who have
> allready tried it out...???
>
> this is hard work, so lets go on...
>
> i'm looking at this tonight...

I agree and already too a short look. looks like all these packages need
gcc-core and the additional sub-package.
how do you think about an eclass for these builds?

achim~

>
> kind regards
> johannes
>
> - --
> Key fingerprint = DCD0 990F 6BD8 6E5F 439D  4257 D5ED FB77 F58D 4435
> http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?search=you%40hanez.org&op=index
>
>


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----


> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iD8DBQE+FdDY1e37d/WNRDURAkS6AKCVRD4kEykx2cJLi4xECebaRTgV2gCgxCEu
> MxF/vySvFQ+lyuRWOfQJS9E=
> =7UXL
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
> --
> gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
>
>


--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list