[gentoo-dev] masked packages in system ..

[gentoo-dev] masked packages in system ..

[Henti Smith]

hi there .. 

this is not the first time this has happened .. but when I try emerge -u system I get errors about masked packages.
How can a maksed package be part of a system update ? 

is this not really silly ? 

I even had this issue with an install where the base emerge system had masked packages once

Henti 

--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] masked packages in system ..

[Benj]

On Friday 27 December 2002 1:02 pm, Henti Smith wrote:
> hi there ..
>
> this is not the first time this has happened .. but when I try emerge -u
> system I get errors about masked packages. How can a maksed package be part
> of a system update ?
>
> is this not really silly ?

Agreed, it does seem strange... I just got this:

root@maya apache # emerge -up world

These are the packages that I would merge, in order:

Calculating world dependencies \
!!! all ebuilds that could satisfy ">=sys-devel/perl-5.6.1-r10" have been 
masked.
!!!    (dependency required by "dev-perl/ExtUtils-MakeMaker-6.05-r4" [ebuild])

Looks like the DEPEND in the MakeMaker ebuild has barfed.
Now, I will file a bug, and normally this all Just Works (tm), but dependency 
nightmares for system ebuilds seems a bit of a bad thing.

just my 2p

/ben


--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] masked packages in system ..

[Michael Cummings]

Hmmm...and I know for a fact that perl-5.6.1-r10 is *not* masked on any platform other than MIPS, and I somehow doubt you are running this on a MIPS.

Incidentally, perl 5.8 was just unmasked for x86.

Mike - the perl maintainer

On Fri, 27 Dec 2002 16:15:28 +0000
Benj <ben@thatproject.co.uk> wrote:

> On Friday 27 December 2002 1:02 pm, Henti Smith wrote:
> > hi there ..
> >
> > this is not the first time this has happened .. but when I try emerge -u
> > system I get errors about masked packages. How can a maksed package be part
> > of a system update ?
> >
> > is this not really silly ?
> 
> Agreed, it does seem strange... I just got this:
> 
> root@maya apache # emerge -up world
> 
> These are the packages that I would merge, in order:
> 
> Calculating world dependencies \
> !!! all ebuilds that could satisfy ">=sys-devel/perl-5.6.1-r10" have been 
> masked.
> !!!    (dependency required by "dev-perl/ExtUtils-MakeMaker-6.05-r4" [ebuild])
> 
> Looks like the DEPEND in the MakeMaker ebuild has barfed.
> Now, I will file a bug, and normally this all Just Works (tm), but dependency 
> nightmares for system ebuilds seems a bit of a bad thing.
> 
> just my 2p
> 
> /ben
> 
> 
> --
> gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
> 


-- 

-----o()o---------------------------------------------
              |  #gentoo-dev  on irc.openprojects.net
Gentoo Dev    |  #gentoo-perl on irc.openprojects.net
Perl Guy      |
              |  GnuPG Key ID:       AB5CED4E9E7F4E2E
-----o()o---------------------------------------------


--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] masked packages in system ..

[Benj]

Correct...

Although I must have screwed something up - I removed the ~mips from KEYWORDS, 
and the ebuild installs fine.  So somethint certainly aint right, but I 
withdraw the implication that it's your fault ;o)

Since I've already exposed by cluenessness, can I ask a dumb question? It 
would be nice to install 5.8 but not make it default.  ie specify 
#!/usr/bin/perl5.8 for playing around with the newer version, but to keep 
trusty 5.6.1 until I'm happy I'm not going to break anything.  Maybe via a 
USE flag at emerge or summat.  Of course this paranoia is perhaps strange 
seeing as my workstation seems to think it's a MIPS, but I would still like 
that feature... <g>

/ben

On Friday 27 December 2002 5:31 pm, Michael Cummings wrote:
> Hmmm...and I know for a fact that perl-5.6.1-r10 is *not* masked on any
> platform other than MIPS, and I somehow doubt you are running this on a
> MIPS.
>
> Incidentally, perl 5.8 was just unmasked for x86.
>
> Mike - the perl maintainer
>
> On Fri, 27 Dec 2002 16:15:28 +0000
>
> Benj <ben@thatproject.co.uk> wrote:
> > On Friday 27 December 2002 1:02 pm, Henti Smith wrote:
> > > hi there ..
> > >
> > > this is not the first time this has happened .. but when I try emerge
> > > -u system I get errors about masked packages. How can a maksed package
> > > be part of a system update ?
> > >
> > > is this not really silly ?
> >
> > Agreed, it does seem strange... I just got this:
> >
> > root@maya apache # emerge -up world
> >
> > These are the packages that I would merge, in order:
> >
> > Calculating world dependencies \
> > !!! all ebuilds that could satisfy ">=sys-devel/perl-5.6.1-r10" have been
> > masked.
> > !!!    (dependency required by "dev-perl/ExtUtils-MakeMaker-6.05-r4"
> > [ebuild])
> >
> > Looks like the DEPEND in the MakeMaker ebuild has barfed.
> > Now, I will file a bug, and normally this all Just Works (tm), but
> > dependency nightmares for system ebuilds seems a bit of a bad thing.
> >
> > just my 2p
> >
> > /ben
> >
> >
> > --
> > gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list


--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] masked packages in system ..

[Henti Smith]

On Fri, 27 Dec 2002 12:31:28 -0500
Michael Cummings <mcummings@datanode.net> wrote:

> Hmmm...and I know for a fact that perl-5.6.1-r10 is *not* masked on any platform other than MIPS, and I somehow doubt you are running this on a MIPS.
> 
> Incidentally, perl 5.8 was just unmasked for x86.
> 
> Mike - the perl maintainer

hmmmm ... 


I had to add ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="~x86" to et it working ... which is not something I wanted to do .. 

Henti 

--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] masked packages in system ..

[Michael Cummings]

Henti,

	It's unmasked as of a few hours ago. Give it time to actually hit the mirrors.

On Fri, 27 Dec 2002 19:57:27 +0200
Henti Smith <bain@tcsn.co.za> wrote:

> On Fri, 27 Dec 2002 12:31:28 -0500
> Michael Cummings <mcummings@datanode.net> wrote:
> 
> > Hmmm...and I know for a fact that perl-5.6.1-r10 is *not* masked on any platform other than MIPS, and I somehow doubt you are running this on a MIPS.
> > 
> > Incidentally, perl 5.8 was just unmasked for x86.
> > 
> > Mike - the perl maintainer
> 
> hmmmm ... 
> 
> 
> I had to add ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="~x86" to et it working ... which is not something I wanted to do .. 
> 
> Henti 
> 
> --
> gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
> 


-- 

-----o()o---------------------------------------------
              |  #gentoo-dev  on irc.openprojects.net
Gentoo Dev    |  #gentoo-perl on irc.openprojects.net
Perl Guy      |
              |  GnuPG Key ID:       AB5CED4E9E7F4E2E
-----o()o---------------------------------------------


--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] masked packages in system ..

[Greg Oliver]

Will it automatically rebuild all packages that are built against Perl
5.6.1 libs when it emerges, or will I have to track them down with a
script and rebuild them manually?

-Greg

On Fri, 27 Dec 2002 15:35:42 -0500
Michael Cummings <mcummings@datanode.net> wrote:

> Henti,
> 
> 	It's unmasked as of a few hours ago. Give it time to actually
> 	hit the mirrors.
> 
> On Fri, 27 Dec 2002 19:57:27 +0200
> Henti Smith <bain@tcsn.co.za> wrote:
> 
> > On Fri, 27 Dec 2002 12:31:28 -0500
> > Michael Cummings <mcummings@datanode.net> wrote:
> > 
> > > Hmmm...and I know for a fact that perl-5.6.1-r10 is *not* masked
> > > on any platform other than MIPS, and I somehow doubt you are
> > > running this on a MIPS.
> > > 
> > > Incidentally, perl 5.8 was just unmasked for x86.
> > > 
> > > Mike - the perl maintainer
> > 
> > hmmmm ... 
> > 
> > 
> > I had to add ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="~x86" to et it working ... which is
> > not something I wanted to do .. 
> > 
> > Henti 
> > 
> > --
> > gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
> > 
> 
> 
> -- 
> 
> -----o()o---------------------------------------------
>               |  #gentoo-dev  on irc.openprojects.net
> Gentoo Dev    |  #gentoo-perl on irc.openprojects.net
> Perl Guy      |
>               |  GnuPG Key ID:       AB5CED4E9E7F4E2E
> -----o()o---------------------------------------------
> 
> 
> --
> gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
> 

--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] masked packages in system ..

[Michael Cummings]

It's actually been put back on hold until we can resolve a problem with
the libperl.so (namely that it is always called libperl.so no matter
what version it refers to). If that is fixed appropriately - hopefully
no remerging will be necessary. If you go with the masked build,
emerging will be necessary, which is something we'd rather avoid.

-Mike

On Fri, Dec 27, 2002 at 10:56:56PM -0600, Greg Oliver wrote:
> Will it automatically rebuild all packages that are built against Perl
> 5.6.1 libs when it emerges, or will I have to track them down with a
> script and rebuild them manually?
> 
> -Greg
> 
> On Fri, 27 Dec 2002 15:35:42 -0500
> Michael Cummings <mcummings@datanode.net> wrote:
> 
> > Henti,
> > 
> > 	It's unmasked as of a few hours ago. Give it time to actually
> > 	hit the mirrors.
> > 
> > On Fri, 27 Dec 2002 19:57:27 +0200
> > Henti Smith <bain@tcsn.co.za> wrote:
> > 
> > > On Fri, 27 Dec 2002 12:31:28 -0500
> > > Michael Cummings <mcummings@datanode.net> wrote:
> > > 
> > > > Hmmm...and I know for a fact that perl-5.6.1-r10 is *not* masked
> > > > on any platform other than MIPS, and I somehow doubt you are
> > > > running this on a MIPS.
> > > > 
> > > > Incidentally, perl 5.8 was just unmasked for x86.
> > > > 
> > > > Mike - the perl maintainer
> > > 
> > > hmmmm ... 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > I had to add ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="~x86" to et it working ... which is
> > > not something I wanted to do .. 
> > > 
> > > Henti 
> > > 
> > > --
> > > gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
> > > 
> > 
> > 
> > -- 
> > 
> > -----o()o---------------------------------------------
> >               |  #gentoo-dev  on irc.openprojects.net
> > Gentoo Dev    |  #gentoo-perl on irc.openprojects.net
> > Perl Guy      |
> >               |  GnuPG Key ID:       AB5CED4E9E7F4E2E
> > -----o()o---------------------------------------------
> > 
> > 
> > --
> > gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
> > 
> 
> --
> gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] masked packages in system ..

[Thomas T. Veldhouse]

I upgraded world an hour or so ago and it upgraded perl to 5.8.  It doesn't
appear on hold to me.  So far, no ill effects.

Tom Veldhouse

----- Original Message -----
From: "Michael Cummings" <mcummings@datanode.net>
To: "Greg Oliver" <greg@algx.net>
Cc: <gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>
Sent: Friday, December 27, 2002 11:04 PM
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] masked packages in system ..


> It's actually been put back on hold until we can resolve a problem with
> the libperl.so (namely that it is always called libperl.so no matter
> what version it refers to). If that is fixed appropriately - hopefully
> no remerging will be necessary. If you go with the masked build,
> emerging will be necessary, which is something we'd rather avoid.
>
> -Mike
>
> On Fri, Dec 27, 2002 at 10:56:56PM -0600, Greg Oliver wrote:
> > Will it automatically rebuild all packages that are built against Perl
> > 5.6.1 libs when it emerges, or will I have to track them down with a
> > script and rebuild them manually?
> >
> > -Greg
> >
> > On Fri, 27 Dec 2002 15:35:42 -0500
> > Michael Cummings <mcummings@datanode.net> wrote:
> >
> > > Henti,
> > >
> > > It's unmasked as of a few hours ago. Give it time to actually
> > > hit the mirrors.
> > >
> > > On Fri, 27 Dec 2002 19:57:27 +0200
> > > Henti Smith <bain@tcsn.co.za> wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Fri, 27 Dec 2002 12:31:28 -0500
> > > > Michael Cummings <mcummings@datanode.net> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hmmm...and I know for a fact that perl-5.6.1-r10 is *not* masked
> > > > > on any platform other than MIPS, and I somehow doubt you are
> > > > > running this on a MIPS.
> > > > >
> > > > > Incidentally, perl 5.8 was just unmasked for x86.
> > > > >
> > > > > Mike - the perl maintainer
> > > >
> > > > hmmmm ...
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > I had to add ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="~x86" to et it working ... which is
> > > > not something I wanted to do ..
> > > >
> > > > Henti
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > -----o()o---------------------------------------------
> > >               |  #gentoo-dev  on irc.openprojects.net
> > > Gentoo Dev    |  #gentoo-perl on irc.openprojects.net
> > > Perl Guy      |
> > >               |  GnuPG Key ID:       AB5CED4E9E7F4E2E
> > > -----o()o---------------------------------------------
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
> > >
> >
> > --
> > gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
>
> --
> gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
>
>



--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

[gentoo-dev] Duplicates - List Problem [Re: [gentoo-dev] masked packages in system ..]

[Thomas T. Veldhouse]

What's going on with the duplicates on this list?  The below message has
arrived twice, one almost 10 hours after the first.

Tom Veldhouse

----- Original Message -----
From: "Thomas T. Veldhouse" <veldy@veldy.net>
To: <mcummings@datanode.net>; "Greg Oliver" <greg@algx.net>
Cc: <gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>
Sent: Friday, December 27, 2002 11:59 PM
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] masked packages in system ..


> I upgraded world an hour or so ago and it upgraded perl to 5.8.  It
doesn't
> appear on hold to me.  So far, no ill effects.
>
> Tom Veldhouse
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Michael Cummings" <mcummings@datanode.net>
> To: "Greg Oliver" <greg@algx.net>
> Cc: <gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>
> Sent: Friday, December 27, 2002 11:04 PM
> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] masked packages in system ..
>
>
> > It's actually been put back on hold until we can resolve a problem with
> > the libperl.so (namely that it is always called libperl.so no matter
> > what version it refers to). If that is fixed appropriately - hopefully
> > no remerging will be necessary. If you go with the masked build,
> > emerging will be necessary, which is something we'd rather avoid.
> >
> > -Mike
> >
> > On Fri, Dec 27, 2002 at 10:56:56PM -0600, Greg Oliver wrote:
> > > Will it automatically rebuild all packages that are built against Perl
> > > 5.6.1 libs when it emerges, or will I have to track them down with a
> > > script and rebuild them manually?
> > >
> > > -Greg
> > >
> > > On Fri, 27 Dec 2002 15:35:42 -0500
> > > Michael Cummings <mcummings@datanode.net> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Henti,
> > > >
> > > > It's unmasked as of a few hours ago. Give it time to actually
> > > > hit the mirrors.
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, 27 Dec 2002 19:57:27 +0200
> > > > Henti Smith <bain@tcsn.co.za> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > On Fri, 27 Dec 2002 12:31:28 -0500
> > > > > Michael Cummings <mcummings@datanode.net> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hmmm...and I know for a fact that perl-5.6.1-r10 is *not* masked
> > > > > > on any platform other than MIPS, and I somehow doubt you are
> > > > > > running this on a MIPS.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Incidentally, perl 5.8 was just unmasked for x86.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Mike - the perl maintainer
> > > > >
> > > > > hmmmm ...
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > I had to add ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="~x86" to et it working ... which is
> > > > > not something I wanted to do ..
> > > > >
> > > > > Henti
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > >
> > > > -----o()o---------------------------------------------
> > > >               |  #gentoo-dev  on irc.openprojects.net
> > > > Gentoo Dev    |  #gentoo-perl on irc.openprojects.net
> > > > Perl Guy      |
> > > >               |  GnuPG Key ID:       AB5CED4E9E7F4E2E
> > > > -----o()o---------------------------------------------
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
> > > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
> >
> > --
> > gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
>
>



--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Duplicates - List Problem [Re: [gentoo-dev] masked packages in system ..]

[Joseph Carter]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1469 bytes --]

On Sat, Dec 28, 2002 at 09:51:08AM -0600, Thomas T. Veldhouse wrote:
> What's going on with the duplicates on this list?  The below message has
> arrived twice, one almost 10 hours after the first.

Most likely the list server believed the message may not have been
delivered, so it sent the message a second time on the assumption that two
copies of the message is better than none.  The reason it thinks this can
be either something on its end or on yours.


If you want no duplicates (note that this will cause you to only get one
copy of messages that are sent both to you and to the list, as this
message is), you can use this very simple procmail recipe:

:0 Wh: msgid.lock
| formail -D 8192 ${PMDIR}/msgid.cache

I actually have this recipe applied after I filter lists into seperate
Maildirs - before list filtering I use a modified version which applies
only to mailing lists, thereby allowing group replies to be seen in both
my inbox and the list.  If you want to do that, copy this recipe to
somewhere before you filter lists and change the cache and lock file
names.  Then add between the two lines above this condition line, or one
rather like it which catches all mailing lists you receive:

* (^(((X-)?Mailing-List)|List-Id):)

Now if only spam were this easy to catch and kill..  ;)

-- 
Joseph Carter <knghtbrd@efn.org>                 If this sig were funny...
 
<Culus> there is 150 meg in the /tmp dir! DEAR LORD


[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 273 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] Duplicates - List Problem [Re: [gentoo-dev] masked packages in system ..]

[Thomas T. Veldhouse]

I am really not sure how you are attributing this to anything on my end, but
I can assure you ... that is not the case.  I noticed a couple of other
messages were also duplicated from other posters.  There is or was something
wrong with the gentoo.org MTA.

Tom Veldhouse

----- Original Message -----
From: "Joseph Carter" <knghtbrd@efn.org>
To: "Thomas T. Veldhouse" <veldy@veldy.net>
Cc: <gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>
Sent: Saturday, December 28, 2002 8:21 PM
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Duplicates - List Problem [Re: [gentoo-dev] masked
packages in system ..]

On Sat, Dec 28, 2002 at 09:51:08AM -0600, Thomas T. Veldhouse wrote:
> What's going on with the duplicates on this list?  The below message has
> arrived twice, one almost 10 hours after the first.

Most likely the list server believed the message may not have been
delivered, so it sent the message a second time on the assumption that two
copies of the message is better than none.  The reason it thinks this can
be either something on its end or on yours.


If you want no duplicates (note that this will cause you to only get one
copy of messages that are sent both to you and to the list, as this
message is), you can use this very simple procmail recipe:

:0 Wh: msgid.lock
| formail -D 8192 ${PMDIR}/msgid.cache

I actually have this recipe applied after I filter lists into seperate
Maildirs - before list filtering I use a modified version which applies
only to mailing lists, thereby allowing group replies to be seen in both
my inbox and the list.  If you want to do that, copy this recipe to
somewhere before you filter lists and change the cache and lock file
names.  Then add between the two lines above this condition line, or one
rather like it which catches all mailing lists you receive:

* (^(((X-)?Mailing-List)|List-Id):)

Now if only spam were this easy to catch and kill..  ;)

--
Joseph Carter <knghtbrd@efn.org>                 If this sig were funny...

<Culus> there is 150 meg in the /tmp dir! DEAR LORD





--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Duplicates - List Problem [Re: [gentoo-dev] masked packages in system ..]

[Joseph Carter]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 630 bytes --]

On Sat, Dec 28, 2002 at 08:23:19PM -0600, Thomas T. Veldhouse wrote:
> I am really not sure how you are attributing this to anything on my end, but
> I can assure you ... that is not the case.  I noticed a couple of other
> messages were also duplicated from other posters.  There is or was something
> wrong with the gentoo.org MTA.

I'm attributing it to a problem on either side since it could be on either
side.  I'm not getting duplicate messages, at least.

-- 
Joseph Carter <knghtbrd@efn.org>                    Sooner or later, BOOM!
 
<Crow-> who gives a shit about US law
<jim> anyone living in the US.


[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 273 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-dev] Duplicates - List Problem [Re: [gentoo-dev] masked packages in system ..]

[Thomas T. Veldhouse]

Either am I, now.  I was at the time I posted that message, and only for
about 3 or 4 of the postings.

Tom Veldhouse

----- Original Message -----
From: "Joseph Carter" <knghtbrd@efn.org>
To: "Thomas T. Veldhouse" <veldy@veldy.net>
Cc: <gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>
Sent: Saturday, December 28, 2002 8:35 PM
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Duplicates - List Problem [Re: [gentoo-dev] masked
packages in system ..]

On Sat, Dec 28, 2002 at 08:23:19PM -0600, Thomas T. Veldhouse wrote:
> I am really not sure how you are attributing this to anything on my end,
but
> I can assure you ... that is not the case.  I noticed a couple of other
> messages were also duplicated from other posters.  There is or was
something
> wrong with the gentoo.org MTA.

I'm attributing it to a problem on either side since it could be on either
side.  I'm not getting duplicate messages, at least.

--
Joseph Carter <knghtbrd@efn.org>                    Sooner or later, BOOM!

<Crow-> who gives a shit about US law
<jim> anyone living in the US.



--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Duplicates - List Problem [Re: [gentoo-dev] masked packages in system ..]

[Michael Cummings]

Are you sure this is a dup and not the fact that you were in my to line and -dev was in the cc? Looks more like the dev list was just slow getting to you (or you own email was slow, one of the two).

On Sat, 28 Dec 2002 09:51:08 -0600
"Thomas T. Veldhouse" <veldy@veldy.net> wrote:

> What's going on with the duplicates on this list?  The below message has
> arrived twice, one almost 10 hours after the first.
> 
> Tom Veldhouse
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Thomas T. Veldhouse" <veldy@veldy.net>
> To: <mcummings@datanode.net>; "Greg Oliver" <greg@algx.net>
> Cc: <gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>
> Sent: Friday, December 27, 2002 11:59 PM
> Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] masked packages in system ..
> 
> 



-- 

-----o()o---------------------------------------------
              |  #gentoo-dev  on irc.openprojects.net
Gentoo Dev    |  #gentoo-perl on irc.openprojects.net
Perl Guy      |
              |  GnuPG Key ID:       AB5CED4E9E7F4E2E
-----o()o---------------------------------------------


--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Duplicates - List Problem [Re: [gentoo-dev] masked packages in system ..]

[Thomas T. Veldhouse]

Yes.  The message arrived more than 9 hours later.  This is also the case
for a couple of other postings I noticed, of which I was not a part at all.

Tom Veldhouse

----- Original Message -----
From: "Michael Cummings" <mcummings@datanode.net>
To: <gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>
Sent: Saturday, December 28, 2002 8:38 PM
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Duplicates - List Problem [Re: [gentoo-dev] masked
packages in system ..]


> Are you sure this is a dup and not the fact that you were in my to line
and -dev was in the cc? Looks more like the dev list was just slow getting
to you (or you own email was slow, one of the two).
>
> On Sat, 28 Dec 2002 09:51:08 -0600
> "Thomas T. Veldhouse" <veldy@veldy.net> wrote:
>
> > What's going on with the duplicates on this list?  The below message has
> > arrived twice, one almost 10 hours after the first.
> >
> > Tom Veldhouse
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Thomas T. Veldhouse" <veldy@veldy.net>
> > To: <mcummings@datanode.net>; "Greg Oliver" <greg@algx.net>
> > Cc: <gentoo-dev@gentoo.org>
> > Sent: Friday, December 27, 2002 11:59 PM
> > Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] masked packages in system ..
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
>
> -----o()o---------------------------------------------
>               |  #gentoo-dev  on irc.openprojects.net
> Gentoo Dev    |  #gentoo-perl on irc.openprojects.net
> Perl Guy      |
>               |  GnuPG Key ID:       AB5CED4E9E7F4E2E
> -----o()o---------------------------------------------
>
>
> --
> gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
>
>



--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list